"D.O.C. The Show"
#1  Cloud. Your Hometown Talk. Self-Educating Since 1815.

Happy Father's Day Dad. Dads. Happy Mother's Day Mom. Moms. Halloween Treats, Thanksgiving Turkey and Ham. Christmas Trees. New Year Eve. Love Proud American Holidays. Keep Dancin 4th July. Born Great.

Tax Day/April 15

Welcome. Rod's Homepage. This is a Homepage and 7-page Passive Private NonForProfit Website.

Clicking on the second Page: Rod's Favorite Links; takes you to a nicely arranged page with 500 or so links to Rod's favorite sites that made him so smart.)

Rod has five Investigative Journalism writings and a few other writing on this Website Blog:             
Tax Day / Scumbags       Rod's Op'ed Twitter Congress      $extortion, Man Survivors           Answer: Russian Conspiracy Theory Hoax      Rod explain why he thinks Ford Case is a Con        The Cosby Verdict               The Resistance Page           Baptism 
   
Question 1, Michael's Judgment, falsely accused man Victims, Court, they did Jesus

             Grown Folks Presidential Library located in United States of America. Tour open today.  
Kids have their own Web site. Now Grown-folks have theirs. Not a kid anymore. No thanks. Sorry, you not educated enough on the issues to get on this site yet. Read a little more. Get back. This Website is a destination and tailored for Grown Folk, Rod. If you are not Grown, 18+, you may ask your mom, your dad, or your grown-guardian(s) first, are you grown enough, before touring this site.                                                         

------------------------------------------------------------------------


Happy April 15 Tax Day and
Commencement Day Speech   
by Rod
   Congratulation On Your Graduation. No matter what level you graduated. You really have not reached your full potential until you read, become aware, and develop solutions for this writing. Go forward with careers, work, furthering education, and making mistakes in life, but do not forget, or become complacent, that it could all end before you reach retirement age. Someone is always watching, listening to you. So, you must continue to oil the machine, question everything, no man or woman is above questioning regardless of their position or job that they hold or side of the law they say they are on or how many years this and that, love your country, and stay woke. You are not American merely by the space you occupy in this great land called America, you become American. Love your country. No one man or group is America. You become American. You then own America in the spirit regardless of your wealth, poverty, or conditions. Freedom: everyone does not have to like you because some things about everyone is not very likable, not pleasant, or not appealing to others. You then work for the improvement of America and yourself. Love your country you are in or leave your country. Be a Proud American. These are the issues of this Election. These are the reasons you will go far, and wide, to vote in this Election. Be well. Be great. Be you.                                                   

                                                           Back to Homepage

        What does Comey's InTerview, FBI, on Tax Day, Trump, Rushbo book review on Comey "Creating a Narrative," a possible frame attempt, God's Analytics Win Chart, whose behind Fake-News Networks, Exhibits A-D, Spirit World, and a Strange phone call Rod got on April 15 have in common? Nothing.

***Addemdum 8/21/2018 Great day for some. This is Rod's last writing for the year. Naah. He won't be updating his blog during the elections this fall for Russian Conspiracy hubla. The site will remain passive. This latest writing will finish in a couple of days, Then, he will take some time off from writing and see you next year. 8/24/2018 wraps it up folks with perfect denominators 24/3=8, or 2 raised to the third power = 2^3=2*2*2=8 = 222 plus 21/3=7+7+7 or 222777(God) all eights equaling all two(s) and seven(s) what a great way to end this story. The way it started. Merry Christmas. Happy Thanksgiving. Happy New Year. Rod.

I finally got to the bottom of what the "hell" was going on with my taxes. Thanks for all the communications Mr. and Mrs. IRS. 2015, I filled a different form, a 1040A instead of a 1040, so they did not put my business activity on the IRS transcript but just the Business Name. 2016, I filed a 1040 instead, so the Business numbers were put on the IRS transcript. The name was not missing, that was in 2017, and because I did not have any sales in 2017, they did not put the name of the business on the IRS tax transcript. 2017, I also put the same income in non-taxable, into taxable, but it was non-taxable which made about an $8,000 mistake that they, the IRS, saved me from paying taxes on, that the IRS corrected for me on the IRS tax account printout. And that genius professor said, "what are you going to do sale produce off the back of a truck for $15,000 a year; well, he was close to one of those tax years in business. Maybe, he was just that good. So, I have no major tax problems folks. But, someone did try to fabricate and frame a "false business tax consideration" with my personal blog with a phone call with false statements about gifts to UNLV. A real scumbag working for the government; scumbag network because they are willing to bring false legal claims against individuals to frame someone for rewards. No way Rod would ever plead guilty to any felonies; he has never had any felonious-malicious criminal intent in mistakes he has made in life.       

*** Don't be a hoot pay your taxes or "Press 1" for the Warrant or "Press 2" to your own decline. Pay your taxes fools and contact the IRS when you think there is an error. And stop calling leaving nut-job messages like today for that wiretap, think its April 15th again? I ain't the President's lawyer, nor political consultant, nor accountant. Never talked to the man. Though, I support most Presidents in Office, Clinton, Bush, and Obama thru their trials, impeachment, and tribulations. Never talked to the men. But, wish them all success as Presidents of this Great Land called America. My America. Never talked to any Russians. One party tried to use, maybe created, the Russian Hoax in the 2016 to win the Election, Plan A or Plan B; sure they will use the Hoax Plan C many more creations in the future; 2018 maybe?

I doubt if anyone is actually following my personal blog, but me and a few others; and you of course, and those trolls; 18 different type of trolls you know http://www.smosh.com/articles/18-types-of-internet-trolls . So, I won't be closing my freedom of speech blog. It has violated no laws; trolls. If it does bother you, you keep calling, stop visiting, stop trollowing me. You must be learning something. Thanks. Rod. Keeping America Great.

I remember watching those old Dragnet movies about finances, wiretaps, and hidden microphones hidden in rooms. This is a good clip on how they work. Now, you can understand what a perjury trap is. Rod's professor talked to the class about how to deal with an FBI investigation. I think he said, shut the door and do not say anything to these people. Likely, because when they ask you a question, they already know the answer with concrete evidence, and just want you to lie; the "Perjury Trap." Now that you have watched the film, lets continue:


           ***Addemdum 8/21/2018 Great day for some. 21 represent God and the two "8s" equals Cohen 8 Counts and Manaford 8 Counts so God sent Rod a call to respond in the eyes of God.

In the closing of the Russian Conspiracy case at the end of this page, Rod tell you his opinion on Plan "A" turning into Plan "B." Rod is not a lawyer, but give him a couple hours and he will give you a mock closing statement to what he thinks is a Scumbag witness, comparable to what he has experienced from government operatives, and those of his like kind; real scumbag working for the government; scumbags, which Rod will give the Argument, that these networks are willing to bring false legal claims against individuals to frame someone for rewards. Rod belief and argument is that these acts were premeditated. Real scumbag working for the government; scumbag network because they are willing to bring false legal claims against individuals to frame someone for rewards. The Fake News will keep the Russian Conspiracy Theories going on for the 50 years. Sorry, I will be enjoying "Heaven on Earth" hopefully as predicted in the Bible by then. The fake-hacks will also continue:

CNBC. “U.S. Democrats Says Report on Cyber Attack Was False Alarm.” CNBC, CNBC, 23 Aug. 2018, www.cnbc.com/2018/08/23/reuters-america-u-s-democrats-says-report-on-cyber-attack-was-false-alarm.html

Rod just finished up a case at the Veterans Hospital, this week, the week of the "8s" where two doctors and a nurse were willing to put false statements in medical documents and fabricate a false document, back date it, full of lies to try to help government; but of course Rod uncovered the lies, their scheme fail, and Rod brought the evidence forward to show they were liars working to try to help a government outcome. Real scumbag working for the government; scumbag network because they are willing to bring false legal claims against individuals to frame someone for rewards. They were all women, similar to that liar at UNLV you hear on the tape recording that they erased from Rod's voicemail The government erased the damaging voicemails in that case too! They must wonder did he tape record and record those voicemails too! Now, they give Rod a call to be quiet. Not.

           Yes, these scumbag networks have existed at the Veterans Hospital for a couple of decades, located in State Government Universities, and are now called the Swamp in Washington. The President Trump (No criminal intent) has fired a large number of choices for trying to keep this Network operative. The FBI has fired and resignated an untold amount of members to drain this Swamp and still uncovering more to fire just last week. After the election, Senate in control, some has suggested it will be time to clean house of this Network swamp operating within many government agencies. Scumbags making personal tape recordings for no other purpose other than drive book sales, blackmailing, or peddling to the highest bidder who will offer them the most rewards. Read the below evidence in the Russian Conspiracy case and after two years there has been no evidence brought forward, but what can be fabricated after the act. If you listen to the scumbag on the tape, it was not the President leading the conversation, it was one person leading the conversation, making sure the right names are recorded, controlling the conversation, controlling the events for his commissioned dollars, was this some of that $20 million he received in the reported bank fraud, and leading to make sure the President agree to his terms, making a tape recording for more money because he is the lawyer, he knows what the law of breaking campaign law is. He is the lawyer with the duty of telling the President that he was breaking a law (No criminal intent by the President); the scumbag set up everything to break the law. This person did the same in court, he did not name the President exactly, he stated the law to the Judge, he knew the law, that in my argument in the next paragraph was a possible frame of the President. 

       ***Addemdum 8/21/2018 Great day for some. 21 represent God and the two "8s" equals Cohen 8 Counts and Manaford 8 Counts so God sent Rod a call to respond in the eyes of God. 

     The scumbag plead guilty to 8 counts of fraud. Is not he an eight time felon. What Judge would allow an admitted eight time felon to testify against anyone about truth in a case. He admitted he is a fraudster, eight times. A case, in the same day, that testified that only believed about 40% of the evidence against another person, 8 out of 18, in another case brought against a similar person, like the scumbag, with a possibility of 80 to 300 years and a scumbag who plead to be an 8 time felon will testify truthfully for 5 years? Why should not Manaford be given an equal pardon, did not the President say he was a good man that made a few mistakes? What Judge or Legitimate Body relying on law would allow an eight time felon that agreed that he is a fraudster eight times but not this one to testify to anything? Kangaroo court maybe. Would you believe anything this individual says, not even his own, or feds, tape recording represents the truth, in Rod's belief. 
Rod opinion is that the tape seemed like it was made for someone acting in an informant role. (Entrapment, criminal intent with malice.)

The swamp. Was not Papadopoluous, or maybe this scumbag, sent a message, this week, before this other person went before a judge, that Papadopolusous did not give the feds enough, so they request long or max sentencing? Was not this a message to every scumbag out there, even eight time felons that if you say the right thing, or tell a lie against someone, or set someone up fabricating evidence, or making tape recordings, that they will be rewarded with money, time with the family, and go home quicker? Is not this the swamp that sentence innocent people in jail? As before? Read the below case.

            The Russian case is tainted from Congress down. Now, they will further taint their case with testimony from the eight time fraudster and eight time felon if all the charges did rise to that level; giving this admitted scumbag the benefit of the doubt, but I think it was reported that all the charges did rise to that level. 

Organization. “Michael Cohen Pleads Guilty to 8 Felony Charges, Claims Trump Directed Hush Payments.” CBS News, CBS Interactive, 22 Aug. 2018, www.cbsnews.com/live/video/20180822130003-michael-cohen-pleads-guilty-to-8-felony-charges-claims-trump-directed-hush-payments/

Stewart, Emily. “Michael Cohen Is Reportedly Being Investigated for $20 Million in Bank and Tax Fraud.” Vox, Vox, 20 Aug. 2018, www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2018/8/20/17759112/michael-cohen-bank-fraud-taxi-business

Schmidt, Michael S., et al. “Michael Cohen Releases Tape of Trump Discussing Hush Money for Playboy Model.” The New York Times, The New York Times, 25 July 2018, www.nytimes.com/2018/07/24/us/politics/trump-cohen-tape.html

Lachlan Markay, Asawin Suebsaeng, Sam Stein. “To 'Cash In' on Trump's Presidency, Michael Cohen Sold Clients on Secrecy and Access.” The Daily Beast, The Daily Beast Company, 10 May 2018, www.thedailybeast.com/to-cash-in-on-trumps-presidency-michael-cohen-sold-clients-on-secrecy-and-access

No Criminal Intent
Mac, Amber, and Amber Mac. “Meet The Corporate Fixers: 5 Business Leaders Tasked With Tackling Big Problems.” Fast Company, Fast Company, 24 Jan. 2014, www.fastcompany.com/3025380/meet-the-corporate-fixers-5-business-leaders-tasked-with-tackling-big-problems

      The scumbag did not flip on the President, the President maintain he was innocent relying on bad advice from his legal counsel (No criminal intent from the President). If you listening to the tape, the scumbag is in control of the act, and leading the criminal act, and is the only one who admitted in court that he intended to break the law, along with his other 8 fraudulent acts who has been rewarded a reduction to nothing much in sentencing if the eight time admitted felon say the President was his partner in crime. He flipped on himself and admitted he was a criminal with criminal intent from the beginning of the act. He stated in court that he knew the law. (Criminal Intent). He would take a bullet or die for the President is a lie now and Rod argue it was a lie then. This scumbag was reported hustling himself for sale as the man to get to the President. He was hustling the same line when he was in contact with those two women wanting and receiving money from him. The $130,000 heist was set up. Yes, he long ago flipped on the President. He was tape recording for the highest bidder before the election. The second heist was in the works; ground work being laid; to set up the President. The scumbag new the law, while making a tape recording setting up the President, he was reported he was also, designing, architecture, the financial documents to set up the President. The whole thing could have been done legal as required that the scumbag lawyer design the accounting legally. He told the President that he needed to "set up a company" but he never told the President that he was setting up anything illegal. But is not this the whole case, no criminal intent by the President heard on the tape-recording. The scumbag is setting up everything and he never said on the tape that any of it was illegal or violating campaign finance law? Business do not have the knowledge of law as lawyers. 

The argument is that he was setting the President up with the campaign finance scheme long before the President knew what was going on. Even with a tape recording in his pocket, the President still believed this scumbag would die for him, while calling his name as his legal counsel giving him misleading messages to give to the public on an Airplane. (The President, no criminal intent, bad advice from corrupt attorneys violating the law.) A attorney has a certain duty to provide a person with advice not intentionally violating the law. But, it may have reported that the President did not make a misleading statement, he was speaking only of knowledge at a certain time in the event. I guess he did not no about it at a certain time but eventually became full blown aware of the demands from the heist. 

A thousand people could come forward, Guilliani already did, that the President requested, directed this scumbag, he could have done it on national TV, he was being recorded, he could not have known entirely what this scumbag was up to, President being set up. The scumbag could have fix the problem as an attorney by directing the President to make the payment himself, by check or cash or money order or cashier check, which would have been legal to hush up a lie about an affair before his family and wife (No Criminal Intent) but the scumbag appears to try to frame the President with "Solicitation of a Crime.". The scumbag testified in court that he knew the law in full. The scumbag had a fiduciary duty to advise the President of that law and work within that law. Where is that tape recording. If this Fiduciary duty was breached between client and attorney then the President should not be bound by the attorney's bad acts of conduct not advising the President on the proper way to handle a situation within the law? 

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/12/15/attorney-lisa-bloom-sought-to-line-up-paydays-for-women-accusing-trump-sexual-misconduct-report.html (No name cited).

" A lawyer can't advise or help a client to do something that is illegal or fraudulent, though. The lawyer also has a duty to keep the client informed of the status of the client's matter. When you hire a lawyer to represent you, you should have confidence that he or she will provide competent, diligent representation, that he or she will not represent someone whose interests are adverse to yours, and that he or she will keep your confidences and keep you informed of how your matter is proceeding."

  Good Attorneys Fix (Fixer) things within the Law
“What Can You Expect From Your Lawyer?” AllLaw.com, www.alllaw.com/articles/legal/article6.asp

B     But, the President was being set up, and there was a need to get the President on something illegal. Has not the President stated continuously that in his mind there was no criminal intent then and none now on his part. Thus, he did not have the same intentions as the scumbag had. There was no partners in crime? The President was no partner in crime with this scumbag but a Businessman directing a reputable paid lawyer, up to now, to fix a problem; within the bounds of the law? In Rod's opinion, a person should never waive or surrender attorney representation nor attorney client privilege in most cases. Court rooms are not about someone liking you, but admissible evidence obtain legally under due process of law and the Rules of Evidence. A lawyer you waive attorney client privilege may themselves create evidence against a person with their opinions, maybe wrong, maybe negative, maybe hostile, maybe personal hate for their client, that may now be unprotected when you waive such privileges. A lawyer may be faced with considering whether their client is a liar and The National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers (NACDL) gives advice on the way forward with this. A lawyer may testify to mens res, what is the state of mind of their client, criminal intent or just innocently fucking up. Well, after scumbags stunt with tape recording of the President a dozen times and writing and selling books by other scumbags, whose to say that any lawyers' working for the President are truthful about anything they testify to about this President. A book deal or untold amount of promises, rewards, money, may be in the waiting for anyone who can "Bring down this President" by lie, frame, fabrication, or fraud; highly unprecedented in nature for government employees. There need to be laws passed by Congress to advert these kind of action for future Presidents; this type of investigation should not be the standard for and investigations and should not set precedent for behavior of law enforcement, media, informants, and government party biased intelligence agencies. 

In Rod's opinion, if there is no tape of this, there is no case to even bring before a grand jury or any competent court or body of the law. The scumbag has already pleaded guilty to his crimes against the President before a Judge in a competent court of law.

Nothing. Humm. Rod generally does not talk about a phone message left to him by a stranger. Okay, today 4/16/2018 Rod will write this page, maybe two or more about that strange woman, J.......e. Rod will call her student and not use her real name, or something or another. She called Rod yesterday posing as a UNLV student, maybe so, and she made a false statement or two left on his voicemail. Rod does not have her number on the caller ID, so he will correct the recorded, in case any 702 wire-taps, ha, ha; Rod's conversation openness about this matter. As of 5/5/2018 someone erased the message from Rod's voice mail, destroying evidence! Could he have already tape recorded the message off the voicemail they must wonder? After you read this, start your own investigation and questioning about things mentioned that effect you, social media as a utility and you pay-to-use, your rights to "due process" under the law, and your vote without intimidation from the opposite political bodies. If you copy and paste a link to view into your address bar, there are further readings on most issues.

                                                         Scumbag Lawyer, Malpractice
           If you have been the victim of following a scumbag attorney; it probably would be wise to admit you followed bad advice and get your shit straight before you end up in court. (No malicious intent.) You know all the fucked up shit you done in your life while following a scumbag attorney because he sure will know that shit he coerced you into being involved with or make it up.

                                                 Good Attorneys Fix (Fixer) things within the Law
“What Can You Expect From Your Lawyer?” AllLaw.com, www.alllaw.com/articles/legal/article6.asp by Rebecca Berlin If you've never worked with a lawyer before, you may not know what to expect from the Attorney-Client relationship. A lawyer owes certain duties to his or her clients, including a duty to avoid conflicts of interest, a duty of confidentiality, a duty to provide competent representation, and others. But what does this mean to you? The lawyer's duty to avoid conflicts of interest means that your lawyer cannot represent someone else whose interests are adverse to yours. This doesn't necessarily mean that a lawyer can't represent someone whose business is in competition with yours. If you need a lawyer to draw up articles of incorporation for your bakery it doesn't mean that the lawyer cannot draft articles of incorporation for another bakery or assist another bakery in negotiating a lease. It does mean that if a lawyer is representing you, he or she can't represent someone else whose interests are adverse to yours in that matter. So if the lawyer is helping you negotiate a lease, the lawyer can't represent the other party to that lease or another person who wants the same space. A lawyer can represent two parties who may have adverse interests if both parties are fully informed and consent to the representation. This might happen where two people want to go into business together, but just want to hire one person to draft their partnership agreement. It might seem like their interests are the same – they both want to open a business together. But each individual's own personal concerns could be at odds with the other's. The lawyer's duty of confidentiality means that anything you talk about with him or her is kept secret. This means that you can feel free to discuss the details of your business with your lawyer without worrying that your competitors or anyone else will hear about it. The lawyer's duty to provide competent representation means that a lawyer must tell you if he or she does not have the expertise to handle your matter. A lawyer is permitted to take a reasonable amount of time to become familiar with an area of law. But if it is too complex, or if the lawyer doesn't have the time to get up to speed on the matter, then he or she should refer you to an attorney who practices in that particular area. A lawyer also has a duty to diligently represent the client. The lawyer should vigorously represent the client's point of view. A lawyer can't advise or help a client to do something that is illegal or fraudulent, though. The lawyer also has a duty to keep the client informed of the status of the client's matter. When you hire a lawyer to represent you, you should have confidence that he or she will provide competent, diligent representation, that he or she will not represent someone whose interests are adverse to yours, and that he or she will keep your confidences and keep you informed of how your matter is proceeding."

              Scumbag Mistrial Possibilities

     And this argument is Rod's opinion, belief, from the evidence that is available. Every thing has phases, Sessions has served the President well staying out of the investigation exposing the investigation to fruition what no one would have ever known. It fruition to its max when the scumbag celebrated over the last months that he was going to bring the President; and his family, possible down with Tom Arnold. He planted the seed, the evidence, the breaking of laws, into the President's campaign, business, family, and possible he had many connections to Russians from his growing up. Nothing honorable for my country came from this scumbag. Maybe, he sold one family out to save his $20,000,000 stash to enjoy with his family.

     Sessions has served honorable. The President has pushed him. Sessions has acted properly for two years. but, everything has phases some think.

Dennis, Steven T. “Trump Gets Path to Fire Sessions Later as Key Republicans Relent.” Bloomberg.com, Bloomberg, 23 Aug. 2018, Bloomberg.com, Bloomberg, www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-08-23/graham-says-he-expects-trump-to-oust-sessions-after-elections

Amatulli, Jenna. “Tom Arnold Says He's 'Taking Trump Down' With Michael Cohen's Help.” The Huffington Post, TheHuffingtonPost.com, 22 June 2018, www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/tom-arnold-taking-trump-down-with-michael-cohens-help_us_5b2cff6ae4b0321a01d087a8

     It is Rod's argument, belief, opinion, that anything that stem from this scumbag's name should not be allowed in court, or at most should result in a Judge's mistrial because of the way the evidence was produced. Here, you saw him on TV in the last month, a person with great hate for a President, boosting to bring him down, with criminal evidence that he fabricated against the President, the business, the campaign and possible the whole family. He would never die for this President while setting him up, building a criminal case, the scumbag knows the law, fabricating evidence, document advice, business advise to entrap the Trump name in possible criminal activity. Maybe, this scumbag hated this successful business man 10 years ago and decided to bring him down.

     The scumbag would serve his country to announce who his business partners really have been to take down this President for the last 10 years. How much of his five year sentence, or maybe no sentence, came from his partners while he was fabricating and tape-recording evidence. The Trump Organization should be immune from investigation until the scumbag expose who his business partners have been to take down the Trump name. He already name one, Tom Arnold. Isn't giving, preparing, tape-recording, entrapping, framing creating false evidence:

“Giving False Evidence or Misleading Information | McElfresh Law.” Jessica C. McElfresh, www.criminallawyersandiego.com/crimes-police-government/giving-false-evidence/

Fox News. “Mueller Team Criticized by Fellow Attorneys for History of Questionable Tactics.” Fox News, FOX News Network, 20 Oct. 2017, www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/10/20/mueller-team-criticized-by-fellow-attorneys-for-history-questionable-tactics.html

England, Deborah C. “Affirmative Defenses in Criminal Cases.” Www.criminaldefenselawyer.com www.criminaldefenselawyer.com/resources/criminal-defense/criminal-defense-case/affirmative-defense.htm  "Sometimes a criminal defendant is entitled to acquittal even though the prosecution has proven every element of the charged offense. This happens when the defendant has successfully raised and the jury has accepted an “affirmative defense” that operates by law to exonerate him. Common affirmative defenses include a plea of insanity, self-defense, mistake of fact, intoxication (in some situations), duress, contributory negligence, entrapment, and the running of the statute of limitations (the time period, starting when the crime occurred, during which a prosecution must begin)."

Staff, LII. “Entrapment.” LII / Legal Information Institute, 13 Apr. 2015, www.law.cornell.edu/wex/entrapment  "Entrapment An affirmative defense in which a defendant alleges that police officers acquired the evidence necessary to commence a criminal prosecution of the defendant by inducing the defendant to engage in a criminal act which the defendant would not otherwise have committed. see, e.g. Jacobson v. United States, 503 U.S. 540(1992)."

“Legal Dictionary - Law.com.” Law.com Legal Dictionary, dictionary.law.com/Default.aspx?selected=211 "clean hands doctrine n. a rule of law that a person coming to court with a lawsuit or petition for a court order must be free from unfair conduct (have "clean hands" or not have done anything wrong) in regard to the subject matter of his/her claim. His/her activities not involved in the legal action can be abominable because they are considered irrelevant. As an affirmative defense (positive response) a defendant might claim the plaintiff (party suing him/her) has a "lack of clean hands" or "violates the clean hands doctrine" because the plaintiff has misled the defendant or has done something wrong regarding the matter under consideration. Example: A former partner sues on a claim that he was owed money on a consulting contract with the partnership when he left, but the defense states that the plaintiff (party suing) has tried to get customers from the partnership by spreading untrue stories about the remaining partner's business practices."

“Correlation Does Not Imply Causation.” Wikipedia, Wikimedia Foundation, 2 May 2018, en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Correlation_does_not_imply_causation "In statistics, many statistical tests calculate correlations between variables and when two variables are found to be correlated, it is tempting to assume that this shows that one variable causes the other. [1][2] That "correlation proves causation," is considered a questionable cause logical fallacy when two events occurring together are taken to have established a cause-and-effect relationship. This fallacy is also known as cum hoc ergo propter hoc, Latin for "with this, therefore because of this," and "false cause." A similar fallacy, that an event that followed another was necessarily a consequence of the first event, is the post hoc ergo propter hoc (Latin for "after this, therefore because of this.") fallacy."

 “Correlation Does Not Imply Causation.” Literary Merit, ipfs.io/ipfs/QmXoypizjW3WknFiJnKLwHCnL72vedxjQkDDP1mXWo6uco/wiki/Correlation_does_not_imply_causation.html

 “Rethinking Actual Causation in Tort Law.” Harvard Law Review, harvardlawreview.org/2017/06/rethinking-actual-causation-in-tort-law/

“15 Logical Fallacies You Should Know Before Getting Into a Debate.” The Best Schools, TheBestSchools.org, thebestschools.org/magazine/15-logical-fallacies-know/

Home > ABA Groups > Criminal Justice > Criminal Justice Standards > Criminal Justice Standards for the Prosecution Function, www.americanbar.org/groups/criminal_justice/standards/ProsecutionFunctionFourthEdition.html         "PART IV INVESTIGATION; DECISIONS TO CHARGE, NOT CHARGE, OR DISMISS; AND GRAND JURY Standard 3-4.1 Investigative Function of the Prosecutor (a) When performing an investigative function, prosecutors should be familiar with and follow the ABA Standards on Prosecutorial Investigations. (b) A prosecutor should not use illegal or unethical means to obtain evidence or information, or employ, instruct, or encourage others to do so. Prosecutors should research and know the law in this regard before acting, understanding that in some circumstances a prosecutor’s ethical obligations may be different from those of other lawyers."

Hg.org, www.hg.org/article.asp?id=35403 “What Does “Fruit of the Poisonous Tree” Mean in Criminal Proceedings? The fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine prevents the prosecution from admitting certain evidence into a criminal case after it has been tainted by a primary illegality. This doctrine is meant to remove illegally-acquired evidence from negatively impacting a criminal defendant. The fruit of the poisonous tree is an extension to the exclusionary rule. The exclusionary rule requires that evidence that is illegally obtained should be excluded from admission in a criminal trial. The fruit of the poisonous tree takes the assessment one step further by excluding evidence that stemmed from the primary illegality, the poisonous tree.”

Exhibit D: 
Because of this misconduct, and now all Rod's messages are deleted or placeholders copied over with one second or two second nothings, it will better serve to preserve evidence in a public manner with the audio public to hear. They too were important because they showed the mind in tranactional/business dealing on several issues being listened too. One person may hear it one way but with the preponderance of evidence and the delete goes to "intent" "malicious" "conspiracy" and "motive;" legal people may see it different. Voicemail April 15, 2018: 

rec_29s.mp3
455.5 KB

“Is It Legal to Record a Conversation in Nevada Without the Other Party's Consent?” Personal Injury Attorneys Parry & Pfau - Henderson NV | 702-213-7379, p2lawyers.com/blog/2016/1/31/is-it-legal-to-record-a-conversation-in-nevada-without-the-other-partys-consent

“Evidence.” Findlaw, dictionary.findlaw.com/definition/evidence.html

Repa, Barbara Kate. “Phone Calls, Voice Mail, and Secret Recordings: What Are Your Rights?” Www.nolo.com, www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/free-books/employee-rights-book/chapter5-4.html "Federal law appears to allow any person involved in a conversation to tape it without the other person’s knowledge or permission—as long as the recording is not made for the purpose of committing a crime, such as extortion. But a number of state laws have much stricter controls—generally requiring that everyone involved must consent before a conversation or an action can be taped."

Staff, LII. “Entrapment.” LII / Legal Information Institute, 13 Apr. 2015, www.law.cornell.edu/wex/entrapment “Entrapment An affirmative defense in which a defendant alleges that police officers acquired the evidence necessary to commence a criminal prosecution of the defendant by inducing the defendant to engage in a criminal act which the defendant would not otherwise have committed. see, e.g. Jacobson v. United States, 503 U.S. 540(1992)."

“When Can an NDA Be Legally Broken?” Law Stack Exchange, law.stackexchange.com/questions/4339/when-can-an-nda-be-legally-broken "There are many reasons that a contract can be void or voidable. Wikipedia will give you a good rundown. The reasons which apply to contracts generally will apply to NDAs specifically. This answer focuses on non-disclosure agreements. Various legal authorities and courts have found contracts to be void in the following circumstances: 1. Crime 2. Torts 3. Public safety 4. Public Health 5. Matters of substantial public concern The Model Penal Code prohibits what it calls compounding. The crime involves accepting payment in exchange for not reporting a crime. Section 242.5. Compounding A person commits a misdemeanor if he accepts or agrees to accept any pecuniary benefit in consideration of refraining from reporting to law enforcement authorities the commission or suspected commission of any offense or information relating to an offense." 

Rod is not a lawyer, but he asks you these questions, if someone thought they were being paid to illegally interfere with the election, they may be intentionally committing a crime themselves; misdemeanor? If they then continually claim this, NDAs are void in criminal acts, public health, matters of substantial public concern, and a lawsuit to get out of  this one may be a frivolous to claim? The person may have not been under any obligation then or now to keep a secret, keep from telling a story, in which they already told, except because of their own contributory negligence and fruition of being paid more money? Going to Court and suing seem to have shown agreement that the NDA did not violate campaign finance law; a request for relief from the Court because they have breached a legitimate legal contract? In either case, would they have "dirty hands" in the matter? Fruit of the Poisonous Tree? Working with the FBI trying to depose a target of a criminal investigations through civil litigation was questionable?

Hg.org, www.hg.org/article.asp?id=35403 “What Does “Fruit of the Poisonous Tree” Mean in Criminal Proceedings? The fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine prevents the prosecution from admitting certain evidence into a criminal case after it has been tainted by a primary illegality. This doctrine is meant to remove illegally-acquired evidence from negatively impacting a criminal defendant. The fruit of the poisonous tree is an extension to the exclusionary rule. The exclusionary rule requires that evidence that is illegally obtained should be excluded from admission in a criminal trial. The fruit of the poisonous tree takes the assessment one step further by excluding evidence that stemmed from the primary illegality, the poisonous tree.”

Zwirz, Elizabeth. “Stormy Daniels Lawsuit against Trump, Michael Cohen, Delayed by Judge.” Fox News, FOX News Network, 27 Apr. 2018, www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/04/27/stormy-daniels-lawsuit-against-trump-michael-cohen-delayed-by-judge.html

“Michael Cohen: Stormy's Lawyer Released Transactions for Different Guys.” NBCNews.com, NBCUniversal News Group, www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/michael-cohen-says-stormy-daniels-lawyer-mixed-him-namesakes-n872871 “"Mr. Avenatti has published some information that appears to be from Mr. Cohen’s actual bank records, and Mr. Cohen has no reason to believe that Mr. Avenatti is in lawful possession of these records," Ryan wrote. In a court filing on Wednesday, Cohen's attorney said some of the transactions attributed to Cohen were actually tied to other people with the same name. "This document is concerning for a number of reasons, including the number of blatantly incorrect statements it contains," Cohen attorney Stephen Ryan wrote in a 24-page complaint letter to a federal judge.”

Staff, LII. “Rule 611. Mode and Order of Examining Witnesses and Presenting Evidence.” LII / Legal Information Institute, 1 Dec. 2011, www.law.cornell.edu/rules/fre/rule_611 "Rule 611. Mode and Order of Examining Witnesses and Presenting Evidence (a) Control by the Court; Purposes. The court should exercise reasonable control over the mode and order of examining witnesses and presenting evidence so as to: (1) make those procedures effective for determining the truth; (2) avoid wasting time; and (3) protect witnesses from harassment or undue embarrassment. (b) Scope of Cross-Examination. Cross-examination should not go beyond the subject matter of the direct examination and matters affecting the witness’s credibility. The court may allow inquiry into additional matters as if on direct examination. (c) Leading Questions. Leading questions should not be used on direct examination except as necessary to develop the witness’s testimony. Ordinarily, the court should allow leading questions: (1) on cross-examination; and (2) when a party calls a hostile witness, an adverse party, or a witness identified with an adverse party."

Affirmative Defense, Cognitive dissonance, Untested, but sound.

You listened to Rod speaking in third-person self. By now, you may think that he was smarter than those MBA or Law School A students, or those self-preserved Honor Students, so why did he sometimes get B when they got A, honored student.

Rod gave this affirmative defense to his MBA Ethics Professor in 2015. He would give the test at the end of class, bring up very controversial subjects before the test, use double meaning phrases or words, contradicts personal beliefs, ideals, and values of Rod, and did not give the time required to take test causing mental discomfort and psychological stress in answering questions. This benefited the students that did not suffer from cognitive dissonance. It actually discriminated against students with cognitive dissonance. Rod has never been diagnosed with cognitive dissonance but when answering questions under the above conditions, that someone may know how to manipulate, could bring about symptoms of cognitive dissonance in answering and perceiving questions wrong.

Similarly, such as interviews with law enforcement or skilled agents may duplicate what Rod’s Ethics professor was skilled in. He worked with a lot of law enforcement officers. He was also skilled at creating the “false narrative" (FAKE NEWS), by ignoring or avoiding what was not the beginning "false narrative" (FAKE NEWS); similar to hiding evidence, exculpatory evidence.” showing the skill to the class, as Rushbo described in the below podcast. In such conditions, the court should consider a person giving an interview or in a questioning, being able to write the question out, study the question, and answer the question in writing to make sure they understood the question. After writing the question, answering the question, they should be able to make changes then, or at a later date. Rod did understand in some situations; the question was not what he perceived asked. If he recalls correctly, Rod got an A on his final exam much greater than test that included the above maneuvers. The final exam did not.

The mere requirement to have to participate in an unethical, dishonest, lying, unfair, insincere, prejudiced, subjective, unfair, predisposed, biased, body, under authority of law, or grouped, network of individuals working together, in a shadowy-way, and answer questions under such authority is psychological stress. Duress. A true proven Affirmative Defense.

In Rod’s opinion, oral interviews and questionings by law enforcement should be grounds for appeal when asked by a person to be given, written and denied, and later changes should be allowed from that oral testimony, when such writings of questions and answers denied. But, Rod has no mind of a lawyer, but that of a Judge and fairness.

“Cognitive Dissonance.” Wikipedia, Wikimedia Foundation, 4 May 2018, en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cognitive_dissonance. “In the field of psychology, cognitive dissonance is the mental discomfort (psychological stress) experienced by a person who simultaneously holds two or more contradictory beliefs, ideas, or values. The occurrence of cognitive dissonance is a consequence of a person performing an action that contradicts personal beliefs, ideals, and values; and also occurs when confronted with new information that contradicts said beliefs, ideals, and values. [1][2] In A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance (1957)”

“Radical Professors Must Stop Forcing Their Views onto Students.” UNLV Scarlet & Gray Free Press, 27 Mar. 2017, www.unlvfreepress.com/radical-professors-must-stop-forcing-views-onto-students/ "There seems to be no separation between college education and politics. If you oppose your professor’s political views, you better be ready to take the heat that is coming your way. This is especially prevalent in English, communications and women’s studies classrooms where it seems that the majority of professors liberal. You can’t even log on to the school library website without being presented an “Anti-Oppression Guide” on the home screen. If you look deeper into that guide, you will find documents there such as a “Syllabus for White People to Educate Themselves.” Yeah, that’s not racist at all. Apparently, things aren’t racist when they’re about white people. There are some useful documents there, but some are radical. Just like the pages about “White Privilege,” “The White Radical Frame,” and “The DJT Resistance.” On the other side of the political spectrum, UNLV history professor Michael Green made comments on his Facebook in February calling President Donald Trump a “syphilitic Nazi in the White Man’s House.” During the interview, the student described the professor as being radically opinionated and unable to handle any sort of challenging views presented to him. At the start of the semester, this professor told the class that they would have to “deal with” some of his “Marxist views”."“Students that do not have the same political beliefs as the professor should not be made to feel uncomfortable expressing their own opinions. The other direction this can go is that the student may express their opinion and then receive grades that they don’t feel reflect the work they have done. This happens at institutions all over the country, UNLV included. Not only do we have professors at this institution that feel the need to express their political views in courses that are not political in nature, but we also spend thousands of dollars per semester to attend a school that presents liberal ideas everywhere we look.”  {{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{Many Democrat Leaders and Republican Leaders 2016-2017 Sowed Sexist and Racial Discord, normalizing it for many Americans, Universities, high schools, mainstream social medias, advertising, sporting events, television, and even other countries}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}

CNN. “Clinton: Trump Supporters in 'Basket of Deplorables...” YouTube, YouTube, 9 Sept. 2016,www.youtube.com/watch?v=OZHp4JLWjNw (1/4 of voters)  {{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{Many Democrat Leaders and Republican Leaders 2016-2017 Sowed Sexist and Racial Discord, normalizing it for many Americans, Universities, high schools, mainstream social medias, advertising, sporting events, television, and even other countries}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}                                    

“'He Has an Affinity for Dictators': Clinton Rips Trump, Says 'Pressures' Caused White Women to Vote for Him.” Fox News, FOX News Network, 13 Mar. 2018, insider.foxnews.com/2018/03/12/hillary-clinton-rips-donald-trump-affinity-dictators-putin-white-women-gop-india-today “Purie asked Clinton why she believes more than 50 percent of white women voted for Trump in 2016. Clinton said Democrats have been losing the Caucasian vote, and already "do not do well with white men." "We don't do well with married, white women [either]," she said. "Part of that is an identification with the Republican Party and [an] ongoing pressure to vote the way that your husband, your boss, your son... believes you should."” {{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{Many Democrat Leaders and Republican Leaders 2016-2018, Sowed Sexist and Racial Discord, normalizing it for many Americans, Universities, high schools, mainstream social medias, advertising, sporting events, television, and even other countries}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}

Vrentas, Jenny, and Jonathan Jones. “Fans Say They're Walking Away from the NFL.” SI.com, www.si.com/nfl/2017/09/26/themmqb-nfl-fans-stopped-watching-colin-kaepernick-anthem-protests-donald-trump-nfl-ratings {{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{Many Democrat Leaders and Republican Leaders 2016-2017 Sowed Sexist and Racial Discord, normalizing it for many Americans, Universities, high schools, mainstream social medias, advertising, sporting events, television, and even other countries}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}

Coren, Michael J. “Black Lives Matter's Biggest Facebook Page Was Allegedly Run by a White Australian Man.” Quartz, Quartz, 9 Apr. 2018, qz.com/1248419/black-lives-matters-biggest-facebook-page-was-allegedly-run-by-a-white-australian-man/ {{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{Many Democrat Leaders and Republican Leaders 2016-2018, Sowed Sexist and Racial Discord, normalizing it for many Americans, Universities, high schools, mainstream social medias, advertising, sporting events, television, and even other countries}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}

“2016 5000 Satire Political Advertising.” Google Search, Google, www.google.com/search?biw=937&bih=922&tbm=isch&sa=1&ei=pjr2WpivL8WOjwOsqbv4BA&q=2016 5000 satire political advertising&oq=2016 5000 satire political advertising&gs_l=img.3...43935.45448.0.47517.5.5.0.0.0.0.55.251.5.5.0....0...1c.1.64.img..0.0.0....0.W2du_bZvs0A  "bernie sanders putin Hillary angela merkel trump boris Johnson brexit cartoon gop republican Russia political cartoons poster campaign theresa russians" {{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{Many Democrat Leaders and Republican Leaders 2016-2017 Sowed Sexist and Racial Discord, normalizing it for many Americans, Universities, high schools, mainstream social medias, advertising, sporting events, television, and even other countries}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}

“House Candidate Drops F-Bomb in New Ad Targeting NRA.” www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/house-candidate-drops-f-bomb-in-new-ad-targeting-nra/ar-AAx8KJE?li=BBnb7Kz&ocid=mailsignout "5-11-2018 A Democratic House candidate from New Mexico hopes to draw attention in an ad with an especially pointed message for the National Rifle Association: "F*** the NRA." {{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{Many Democrat Leaders and Republican Leaders 2016-2018, Sowed Sexist and Racial Discord, normalizing it for many Americans, Universities, high schools, mainstream social medias, advertising, sporting events, television, and even other countries}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}

“Diamond & Silk React to Ad Urging Moms to Warn Kids of GOP.” Fox News, FOX News Network, video.foxnews.com/v/5784210908001/#sp=show-clips {{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{Many Democrat Leaders and Republican Leaders 2016-2018, Sowed Sexist and Racial Discord, normalizing it for many Americans, Universities, high schools, mainstream social medias, advertising, sporting events, television, and even other countries}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}

“Moms of 'SNL' Critique Show's Trump Jokes - CNN Video.” CNN, Cable News Network, 13 May 2018, www.cnn.com/videos/cnnmoney/2018/05/13/saturday-night-live-moms-critque-trump-humor-abc-orig-vstop.cnn/video/playlists/money-and-late-night-laughs/ 
{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{Many Democrat Leaders and Republican Leaders 2016-2018, Sowed Sexist and Racial Discord, normalizing it for many Americans, Universities, high schools, mainstream social medias, advertising, sporting events, television, and even other countries}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}

Shane, Scott. “These Are the Ads Russia Bought on Facebook in 2016.” The New York Times, The New York Times, 1 Nov. 2017, www.nytimes.com/2017/11/01/us/politics/russia-2016-election-facebook.html                                          These Russian adds targeting some 3 million Russian Americans show one thing, that all Russians are not the same. From the adds, you can see there is no "1" white racist on top, but a group of different Russians buying advertisements as diverse as the United States. They are Satire and Political ads showing that Russians are diverse in politics and were not all for Trump, but for Bernie, and Hillary also, protected by the US Constitution if they were in America and Citizens. Democratic countries are naturally divided, 50/50 preferable would be perfect democracy, Extreme communist or fascist countries have one voice with no division. Rod. {{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{Many Democrat Leaders and Republican Leaders 2016-2017 Sowed Sexist and Racial Discord, normalizing it for many Americans, Universities, high schools, mainstream social medias, advertising, sporting events, television, and even other countries}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}

“Official Ben Garrison Cartoons.” Grrr Graphics, grrrgraphics.com/ “AT GRRR GRAPHICS, WE ARE TRYING TO DO OUR PART BY MEANS OF ARTWORK TO HELP RAISE AWARENESS OF THE DRIFT TOWARD TYRANNY. We as private citizens need to reclaim and fight for our rights as enumerated in our Constitution. It’s time to speak out and express our outrage at the growing tyranny of Big Government. It is our patriotic duty to share the truth. To expose the incessant lies of the Fake News Media, the corruption of the entrenched Deep State, and the violent attacks of the Radical Left. We were dismayed at an America, where our rights and freedoms are systemically being torn apart in the murky swamplands of Washington DC. Our artwork generates millions of monthly impressions on social media. Drawing politically incorrect cartoons the mainstream media won’t run. Who is Ben Garrison? Ben Garrison is an independent political cartoonist based in Northwest Montana. Ben began drawing cartoons in 2009 to protest the central banker bailout, bloated government and the slide toward tyranny. Ben’s cartoons have been seen by millions of people around the world. Ben is not part of the mainstream media and editors do not tell him what he can and cannot draw. I see your name on racist cartoons on the internet. Are you some kind of crazed Nazi or white supremacist? Ben Garrison has been the target of an ongoing smear campaign to ruin his online reputation and his career as a commercial artist. Internet trolls have defaced his work into racist and anti-semitic propaganda. Ben Garrison is neither racist nor anti-Semitic and has fought back against the online trolls by writing a book. It’s available on Amazon”

York, Byron, and Evan Vucci. “Byron York: Harvard Study: CNN, NBC Trump Coverage 93 Percent Negative.” Washington Examiner, 19 May 2017, www.washingtonexaminer.com/byron-york-harvard-study-cnn-nbc-trump-coverage-93-percent-negative

Rod is not a lawyer. He does not think Rush Limbaugh is a TV lawyer, either.

      “Rush Limbaugh Podcast Friday - April 13,2018.” YouTube, YouTube, 13 Apr. 2018, www.youtube.com/watch?v=AItTvJ0FkHE

                “Rush Limbaugh Podcast Friday April 13,2018.” YouTube, YouTube, 13 Apr. 2018, https://tinyurl.com/y7clqr8u

                “Rush Limbaugh Podcast Monday - April 16,2018.” YouTube, YouTube, 16 Apr. 2018, www.youtube.com/watch?v=ObinaGFzncs&t=3869s

                “Evidence.” Findlaw, dictionary.findlaw.com/definition/evidence.html

                “Difference between ‘Giving False Evidence’ and ‘Fabricating False Evidence.’” World's Largest Collection of Essays! Published by Experts, 11 Aug. 2015, www.shareyouressays.com/knowledge/difference-between-giving-false-evidence-and-fabricating-false-evidence/119642

                 Las Vegas, Nevada "Extortion" Laws, www.shouselaw.com/nevada/extortion.html

                 “18 U.S. Code § 594 - Intimidation of Voters.” LII / Legal Information Institute, www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/594

                “5 Tips on How to React to a Federal Investigation.”                           Lawfirms.comwww.lawfirms.com/resources/criminal-defense/5-tips-how-react-federal-investigation

                losangeleslawyersnow. “3 Tips When Under Investigation | Know What To Do If You Are Under Investigation.” YouTube, YouTube, 24 May 2015, www.youtube.com/watch?v=jHGYNyovIys

                Georgia, www.georgialegalaid.org/resource/your-basic-constitutional-rights-in-the-crimi
     
4th Amendment violations  5th Amendment violations  6th Amendment violations   8th Amendment violations
“The 6th Amendment's Confrontation Clause.” Findlaw, criminal.findlaw.com/criminal-rights/the-6th-amendment-s-confrontation-clause.html "The 14th Amendment has made the 6th Amendment's right to confrontation applicable to state court as well as federal court. The confrontation clause guarantees criminal defendants the opportunity to face the prosecution's witnesses in the case against them and dispute the witnesses' testimony. This guarantee applies to both statements made in court and statements made outside of court that are offered as evidence during trial. Out-of-Court Statements. In building a case, prosecutors may want to use statements that people have made outside of the courtroom as evidence against the defendant. If the person making the statements does not appear in court to testify, however, using such statements may constitute a confrontation clause violation. Before Crawford, the Supreme Court had held that out-of-court statements did not violate the confrontation clause as long as they were adequately reliable. In Crawford, the Court changed course and determined that defendants had a right to cross-examine out-of-court statements, regardless of whether or not the statements were reliable. After Crawford, the government cannot use out-of-court statements that are offered as testimony against the defendant unless the witness is unavailable and the defendant has had a previous opportunity to cross-examine the witness."

                “Category:Hillary Clinton Controversies” Wikipedia, Wikimedia Foundation, 27 Jan. 2018, en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Hillary_Clinton_controversies

                  “The Federal Grand Jury: Ten Tips for the Unwary | Solomon L. Wisenberg. | Washington D.C.” Solomon L. Wisenberg, www.wisenberglaw.com/Articles/The-Federal-Grand-Jury-Ten-Tips-for-the-Unwary.shtml

                  “I Want to Add to My Medical Record and Read Your Notes – Should You Let Me?” MedAxiom - Synergistic Healthcare Solutions, www.medaxiom.com/blog/i-want-to-add-to-my-medical-record-and-read-your-notes-should-you-let-me (Yes)

                  “Puffery.” Wikipedia, Wikimedia Foundation, 13 Apr. 2018, en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Puffery "Puffery refers to exaggerated or false praise [1] In law, puffery is a promotional statement or claim that expresses subjective rather than objective views, which no "reasonable person" would take literally. [2]"

                Is Framing Someone for a Crime a Crime? - 

https://www.quora.com/Is-framing-someone-for-a-crime-a-crime

               In some's opinion, with so much provable corruption and leaks already, a great defense against the results of any investigation, only a fool would fire Mueller or anyone else from this investigation on this date! But, Washington DC is full of self-destructive fools, 10 cent TV lawyers, not attorneys, journalist pretending to be such, but are not, and those informants and leakers. Maybe starting a new robust vigorous investigation "anew" of cover-up, erasing all the corruption in the case; De Novo. That does not get rid of the case, it starts a new investigation by Democrats in fall or 2019 based on obstruction instead of winding down this possible frivolous investigation of Russian collusion altering the election results. With non sense, Facebook sold 26 billion dollars in adds in 2016, and like thousands of dollars in Facebook Russian adds fooled Americans who Trump and Clinton were, like Americans are stupid and did not already know the candidates. As George Carlin would say, Wikipedia has the answers to Clinton History, or the Obama video says a lot nicer, "you full of shit." According to the below information, Facebook had only 20% of the market in 2017, less in 2016, and Rod has not clicked a Facebook add in 10 years and does not use Facebook. He knew all about Hillary Clinton background and the election. A clever way to drive Facebook's sales. Much less, the President Trump people could have colluded with Russia, that may not be a crime which had no substantial impact on the election vote results (mixing apples and oranges in conspiracy theory). Collusion itself is not a crime. The DNC email leak itelf may have not been a crime, discussed later in this writing. Many think the investigation should end today, but this would have to be a move by Congress or Justice department to shut down the investigation by bringing it to conclusion on evidence so far, not firing people. Probably on the evidence, Congress and some in Senate have closed, or want to bring to close, the case on the investigation. It is probable time to demand a report of findings within 90 days from the Special Counsel to Congress based on solid evidence, not fabricated, maybe he-say she-say testimonial evidence and leaks, like many, have been motivated by profit so far with book deal and paid TV appearances, and many more desire future profits and book deals tainting truth with profits. No more evidence needed. Rod has closed the case on the matter in this Research, April 15 - May 10th, 2018.  But, the President did not start the investigation and would probably be a very foolish person to end it with firings. Rod is not a lawyer, and this research does not constitute legal advise that anyone should follow. *Opinion, yes it was proper from a legal stand point for Sessions to recuse himself from being a part of this investigation. Mexicans, Mexican Nationalist living generational and raising their kids as Mexican Nationalist Anti-American Anti-flag Anti-pledge operating and living in the United States, and Mexican politicians interfered with 2016 election, Real names and real people:

Reuters, Source: “Mexican Politician Calls for 'Strong Campaign' against Trump in Viral Ad – Video.” The Guardian, Guardian News and Media, 11 Mar. 2016, www.theguardian.com/us-news/video/2016/mar/11/trump-mexico-insults-viral-campaign-ad-video "Mexico rages against Trump visit Reaction from Mexico against the Republican nominee's visit is swift and brutal.By NICK GASS 08/31/2016 06:57 AM EDT Updated 08/31/2016 12:45 PM EDT Former Mexican President Vicente Fox… Trump is "not welcome" in her country, former Mexican first lady Margarita Zavala de Calderón tweeted Wednesday morning, after news broke of the Republican nominee's impending visit and meeting with Nieto. Zavala, who has previously expressed a desire to run for the presidency in 2018, served in the Mexican Congress in the 1990s. Calderón retweeted the message from his wife, as well as the Hillary Clinton campaign's statement denouncing Trump anew in light of his meeting with the current Mexican president; former President Felipe Calderón. Guadalajara Mayor Enrique Alfaro Ramirez also railed against Trump… Arturo Sarukhan, the Mexican ambassador to the U.S. from 2007 to 2013, wrote on Twitter… Mexican Senate President Roberto Gil Zuarth tweeted…"

“Nationalist Front of Mexico.” Wikipedia, Wikimedia Foundation, 16 June 2018, en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nationalist_Front_of_Mexico "Since its formation in 2006, the Nationalist Front of Mexico claims it was formed by people coming from different political tendencies, social positions and cultural backgrounds who fight legally and peacefully for the national renewal of their country and for the unity of the Mexican nation. The organization opposes what it sees as "Anglo"-American culture and influences[1] and rejects the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo, as well as what its members consider the "American occupation" of territory formerly belonging to Mexico and now form the southwestern United States. On its website, the front states: "We reject the occupation of our nation in its northern territories, an important cause of poverty and emigration. We demand that our claim to all the territories occupied by force by the United States be recognized in our Constitution, and we will bravely defend, according to the principle of self-determination to all peoples, the right of the Mexican people to live in the whole of our territory within its historical borders, as they existed and were recognized at the moment of our independence."[2]"


"History in Rural White and Black America Vote'

Richter, Felix. “Infographic: Facebook's Growing Stature in the Online Ad Market.” Statista, 26 Mar. 2018, www.statista.com/chart/13348/facebook-share-of-global-online-ad-revenue/

  “Category:Hillary Clinton Controversies” Wikipedia, Wikimedia Foundation, 27 Jan. 2018, en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Hillary_Clinton_controversies

“Obama To Trump: ‘Stop Whining’ About A Rigged Election.” YouTube, YouTube, 18 Oct. 2016, www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZPpt7-QOGKc

therustyfishplate. “George Carlin - Stupid People.” YouTube, YouTube, 30 Dec. 2014, www.youtube.com/watch?v=AyifuNC0MT8 "u about the same amount of time you be listening to some guy say fairly intelligent He is full of s***" Stupid

In an analogous case to financial activity and guilt by association is a more serious matter that probable is nothing to joke about. This article has a lot to do with aiding a terrorist group with the intentions of overthrowing America. I do not think Russia has been labeled a terrorist group. Rod does not have privy to "intelligence" to know the other part. But this is a good article to read about how not to lend material support to such an organization trying to do such: Cole, David. 2008 Terror Financing, Guilt by Association and the Paradigm of Prevention in the ‘War on Terror ,’ Georgetown Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper No. 1262792, https://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1441&context=facpub "[Terror] Financing, Guilt by Association and the Paradigm of Prevention in the ‘War on Terror.’ The Supreme Court has declared guilt by association ‘alien to the traditions of a free society and the First Amendment itself’.28 It violates both the Fifth Amendment, which requires that guilt must be personal, and the First Amendment, which guarantees the right of association. The statutes are analytically indistinguishable from the McCarthy era laws that penalised association with the Communist Party. Congress specifically found that the Communist Party was a foreign-dominated group engaged in [terrorism] for the purpose of overthrowing the United States.29 The Supreme Court did not question that finding, but nonetheless ruled that even with respect to such a group, individuals could not be penalised for their associations absent proof of ‘specific intent’ to further the group’s illegal ends.30 The material support statutes require no ‘specific intent’, and punish people solely for their associational support of specified group" 

A. "The Criminal ‘Material Support’ Statute – 18 USC §2339B and 8 USC §1189

B. Immigration Consequences of ‘Material Support’ under 8 USC §1182

C. Embargoing Individuals and Groups under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act"

----------------------------------------------------

Heath, Brad. “Russian Firm Charged in Election Interference Case Pleads Not Guilty.” USA Today, Gannett Satellite Information Network, 9 May 2018, www.usatoday.com/story/news/2018/05/09/concord-management-arraignment-russia-investigation/594454002/

Radio talk show host, television news, legal analysis, and common folk dialogue lit up when an indictment came out against Russia. It was signed on February 16, 2018. Some said trolls from Russia were helping Trump, Hillary, Bernie,  Jill Stein, and Trump. But, only Clinton after the election. Berne Sanders openly denied the claim. The Alternative Argument. Many of them were accusing the document of being biased. The dossiers were close to Clinton. Some of the investigators/prosecutors had donated to Hillary Clinton campaign.  It came out President Day Friday, weekend. Some said the document was framed that Russia was supporting many of Hillary’s opponents before the election and not her. The Alternative Argument would probably be: some talk show host brought attention to the evidence. It did not seem right and exculpatory evidence regarding Clinton receiving assistance before the 2016 Election may never be answered because most predicted that the open indictment would never come to trial. The defendants were warned and may not leave Russia, a non-extradictional country to the United States. Such a finding, may negate the premise that these Russians especially had a vendetta against Clinton. Maybe a premise that they were interested in fraudent donations playing both sides of politics would be more suitable.  $6.8 billion from Americans and much more counting dark money from abroad. Kennedy, Liz and Tausanovitch, Alex wrote (7) July 17, 2017, A perfect report for a perfect day, an article on this dark money, possible fruad, for many years. The Link is https://www.americanprogress.org/issues/democracy/reports/2017/07/17/435886/secret-foreign-spending-u-s-elections-america-needs-disclose-act/ and states:

More than $900 million in dark money spent to influence federal elections in last five cyclesIn presidential races, secret political spending went up thirty fold from $5.9 million in 2004 to $183.5 million in 20162014 midterm elections were the most expensive in history with dark money spending 31 percent of all outside spendingIn 2016, 840 LLCs donated a combined total of roughly $21 million to groups backing presidential candidates, but 109 LLCs did the same in 2012 race (Kennedy, Tausanovitch.) Some brought attention that they were indicted for fruad and there was good evidence. A dozen may have been working for the same company. Some may have been feeding wiki-leaks. Some were using bank accounts with false social security numbers, some were using Twitter accounts as bots or different American names, some were using Facebook different names, and using emails with different names other than there own. This is common but fraud using email is again detected.  However, some of the accounts were actually messaging the truth even though they did criticize and not support Hillary Clinton. The framework being framed after the election, and today, is that anyone who disagrees with mainstream news or Hillary are working with or for Russia. According to below article at WND, the FBI has made 48,642 warrant requests, including American Citizens: browsing history, gag orders, customer data, personal data, telephone records may include their callers and their callers and their callers, etc, and/or billing information. Many accuse it of taking away Fourth Amendment.

Suggested Website Links:

http://www.wnd.com/2018/02/super-secret-spy-court-raises-alarm-over-feds-snooping/

Russia scare in the past: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McCarthyism

http://www.checktheevidence.com/audio2/ET%20and%20UFO/Catherine%20Austin-Fitts%20-%20Black%20Budget%20-%20'Meeting%20Aliens'%20Coast%20to%20Coast%20-%2011%20Nov%202007.mp3

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4JuqpNPxf24

----------------------------------------------------

Kelly, Erin. “Russia Probe: House Intel Republicans End Investigation, Find 'No Evidence' of Collusion.” USA Today, Gannett Satellite Information Network, 13 Mar. 2018, www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2018/03/12/russia-probe-house-intel-republicans-end-investigation-despite-dem-protests/411745002/

Turner, Trish. “Senate Republicans Call for Special Counsel to Investigate DOJ's Russia Probe.” ABC News, ABC News Network, 15 Mar. 2018, abcnews.go.com/Politics/senate-republicans-call-special-counsel-investigate-dojs-russia/story?id=53784553

Associated Press. “GOP-Led House Panel Clears Trump Campaign in Russia Probe.” WTOP, WTOP, 28 Apr. 2018, wtop.com/national/2018/04/house-intel-panel-releases-final-report-on-russia-probe/

              “What Is Exculpatory Evidence?” Rottenstein Law Group LLP, www.rotlaw.com/legal-library/what-is-exculpatory-evidence/

“Mueller's Prosecutor Andrew Weissman Cited for ‘Corrupt Legal Practices.’” Www.independentsentinel.com, 15 Feb. 2018, www.independentsentinel.com/muellers-prosecutor-andrew-weissman-cited-corrupt-legal-practic

“Mueller's 'Pit Bull' Andrew Weissmann Busted for Withholding Evidence in Previous Case.” Sara A. Carter, 18 Feb. 2018, saraacarter.com/muellers-pit-bull-andrew-weissmann-busted-withholding-evidence-previous-case/

“BREAKING: Lawmakers Make Criminal Referral on Clinton, Comey, Lynch to DOJ on Steele Dossier.” Sara A. Carter, 18 Apr. 2018, saraacarter.com/breaking-lawmakers-make-criminal-referral-on-clinton-comey-lynch-to-doj-on-steele-dossier/

Correll, Diana Stancy, and Manuel Balce Ceneta. “FBI's James Baker, Lisa Page Resign.” Washington Examiner, 5 May 2018, www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/fbis-james-baker-lisa-page-resign. "James Baker, who served as the bureau’s top lawyer until late last year when he was reassigned as an adviser to FBI Director Christopher Wray, is resigning, per the New York Times. He is also being looked at for possibly disclosing classified informvation with journalists about the so-called Trump dossier, though he has not been charged."

Pandey, Erica. “Behind the FBI Agent's ‘Insurance Policy’ Text about Trump.” Axios, Axios, 18 Dec. 2017, www.axios.com/behind-the-fbi-agents-insurance-policy-text-about-trump-1515110669-baa07e7d-77a0-4bf1-84a6-fbcb79ec1771.html. "[Before election day], In the text exchange between FBI agent Peter Strzok and FBI lawyer Lisa Page — both of whom were formerly working on Special Counsel Robert Mueller's team — Strzok seemingly referred to an "insurance policy" against a Trump presidency. The Wall Street Journal reports that he meant to refer to the Russia probe, not a plan to harm the candidate, citing sources familiar with his account."

Correll, Diana Stancy. “FBI Won't Seek out Messages from Peter Strzok, Lisa Page Exchanged on Personal Devices.” Washington Examiner, 5 May 2018, www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/fbi-wont-seek-out-messages-from-peter-strzok-lisa-page-exchanged-on-personal-devices

Breitbart News. “Comey Adviser Lisa Page Resigns from FBI.” Breitbart, Breitbart News Network, 5 May 2018, www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/05/04/comey-adviser-lisa-page-resigns-from-fbi/ "Jesse Byrnes reports in The Hill that Lisa Page, who notoriously exchanged anti-Trump emails with fellow FBI employee, now-demoted counterintelligence agent Peter Strzok, has resigned from the bureau. Lisa Page, another FBI official who served as an adviser to Comey and his deputy at the bureau, Andrew McCabe, on various legal issues, is also resigning, the Timesreported."

Hsu, Spencer S. “Ex-Justice Dept. Lawyer Caught in 'Most Serious' Internal Corruption Case in Recent Memory.” The Washington Post, WP Company, 8 Mar. 2018, www.washingtonpost.com/local/public-safety/ex-justice-dept-lawyer-caught-in-most-serious-internal-corruption-case-in-recent-memory/2018/03/08/560071e2-2262-11e8-86f6-54bfff693d2b_story.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.0cc2ca3d54c0 "Wertkin worked from December 2010 to April 2016 in the department section responsible for recovering $4.7 billion in misspent tax dollars in 2016 alone. Under the False Claims Act, whistleblowers can receive part of recovered funds for tipping off fraud in government services and contracts by filing what are known as qui tam lawsuits under seal to protect their identities while the United States investigates. Wertkin “took grotesque advantage” of his government position by “shaking down companies” and revealing confidential information and “jeopardized the integrity of the civil justice system and unfairly cast a shadow over the work of the civil fraud section,” Harris said."

CBS News. “Fusion GPS Paid Former British Spy $168,000 to Work on Trump Dossier - Report.” CBS News, CBS Interactive, 2 Nov. 2017, www.cbsnews.com/news/report-fusion-gps-paid-steele-168000-to-work-on-trump-dossier/

Ward, Alex. “There's a Second Trump-Russia Dossier.” Vox, Vox, 30 Jan. 2018, www.vox.com/world/2018/1/30/16951490/trump-russia-dossier-cody-shearer-memo-nunes

Peter S. Green and John Mazor. “Corrupt Justice: What Happens When Judges' Bias Taints a Case?” The Guardian, Guardian News and Media, 18 Oct. 2015, www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/oct/18/judge-bias-corrupts-court-cases "The US Supreme Court ruled that Benjamin’s bias was so extreme that his failure to step aside violated Caperton’s right to due process under the Constitution’s Fourteenth Amendment. The case, which spawned Grisham’s 2008 best-seller, “The Appeal,” underscored the kind of underhanded dealing that has stained the judiciary."

“10. CROSS-EXAMINATION AND IMPEACHMENT.” Http://Law.indiana.edu/Instruction/Tanford/b723/10impeach/T10.Pdf, law.indiana.edu/instruction/tanford/b723/10impeach/T10.pdf  “B. IMPEACHMENT 1. General Rule A hearsay statement that a witness disliked the defendant may be admitted to show the witness's bias. Any party may impeach the credibility of any witness with evidence suggesting that the witness’s direct testimony is unworthy of belief. A witness's testimony may be unreliable for three quite different reasons: 1 a) The witness may be deliberately lying and therefore knowingly committing the crime of perjury -- it happens, but people willing to commit crimes in front of judges are rare. b) More likely, the witness is trying to tell the truth, but happens to be mistaken because he or she saw the event incorrectly, has forgotten parts, misinterpreted what the witness saw, etc. c) The witness may be telling half-truths, exaggerating parts, or omitting details out of embarrassment, love, anger, political beliefs, or other emotions. 2. Impeachment Usually Involves the Use of Otherwise Inadmissible Evidence 9. Prior Inconsistent Statements and Acts Under common law, a witness may be impeached by proof the witness has contradicted him or herself through evidence of prior acts or statements that are inconsistent with testimony given on direct examination. It is important to remember that the relevance of inconsistencies is that it undermines the credibility of all statements, not that the earlier statement is likely to be the more reliable. We will come back to this when we cover hearsay. There is no federal rule about self-contradiction, but many states have adopted rules about it.”

“Prosecutorial Misconduct - Definition, Examples, Cases, Processes.” Legal Dictionary, 8 Feb. 2017, legaldictionary.net/prosecutorial-misconduct/ “Prosecutors may engage in a wide variety of illegal and unethical acts in the name of getting a conviction. What follows are several types of prosecutorial misconduct. This kind of behavior can vary from case to case, but the types of prosecutorial misconduct presented in this list are some of the more common examples of prosecutorial misconduct. Failure to Disclose Exculpatory Evidence Improper Argument Improper Use of the Media Introduction of False Evidence Discrimination in Jury Selection Abuse of Prosecutorial Discretion Wrongful Conviction by Prosecutorial Misconduct When a suspect is found guilty of a crime after a prosecutor has presented falsified evidence, or engaged in other misconduct, the defendant may have the verdict overturned by the appellate court.”

Crowe, Jack. “DOJ IG Recommends Criminal Charges Against Andrew McCabe.” National Review, National Review, 19 Apr. 2018, www.nationalreview.com/news/andrew-mccabe-criminal-charges-recommended-inspector-general/

“House Freedom Caucus Drafts Articles Of Impeachment Against Rosenstein [for not turning over subpoenaed documents by Congress].” Talking Points Memo, 1 May 2018, talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/house-freedom-caucus-drafts-articles-impeachment-rosenstein

Savage, Charlie. “Why Answering Mueller's Questions Could Be a Minefield for Trump.” The New York Times, The New York Times, 2 May 2018, www.nytimes.com/2018/05/01/us/politics/trump-mueller-interview-questions.htm

Dershowitz, Alan. “Donald Trump's Better off Litigating: Alan Dershowitz.” USA Today, Gannett Satellite Information Network, 3 May 2018, www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2018/05/03/donald-trump-better-litigating-testifying-alan-dershowitz-editorials-debates/34524873/ "In my experience, subjects of criminal investigations rarely help themselves by speaking to prosecutors or testifying before a grand jury. Far more often, they hurt themselves by falling into a perjury trap carefully set by prosecutors. "When prosecutors invite a subject to talk to them, they are not trying to help the subject. They are trying to bolster their case against him. Subjects can become targets and then defendants even if they tell the truth."

GIULIANI FURIOUS! After WaPo ... - Thegatewaypundit.com. www.bing.com/cr?IG=5C75F29BB61E4DE79854DE0A7A2A414C&CID=1DE80EBBEB1D66A414A2055FEAB26777&rd=1&h=fAmk5b94eDZCFNkL6LusXlU5-oL_6yjBBV1ASYTphX0&v=1&r=http://thegatewaypundit.com/2018/05/rudy-giuliani-responds-to-feds-wiretapping-michael-cohens-phone-lines-including-call-to-trump/&p=DevEx.LB.1,5108.1 "Costa tweeted: NEW: Giuliani tells me he can’t confirm there were wiretaps, hasn’t been informed. But when read NBC report, he was furious. “If they picked up the president, they would have had to notify him.” Said if true, wld be a “mockery” of attorney-client privilege and “gov’t misconduct”

Colvin, Catherine Lucey and Jill. “Trump: 'Retainer' Covered Stormy Daniels Payoff.” Time, Time, 3 May 2018, time.com/5263872/giuliani-trump-repaid-cohen-stormy-daniels-payment/ "(WASHINGTON) — President Donald Trump said Thursday reimbursement to his personal lawyer for hush money paid to porn actress Stormy Daniels was done through a monthly retainer and “had nothing to do with the campaign.”

Linge, Mary Kay. “How Cohen Gained Access to $774K in Cash during Election.” New York Post, New York Post, 5 May 2018, nypost.com/2018/05/05/how-cohen-gained-access-to-774k-in-cash-during-election/ "Michael Cohen, President Trump’s personal lawyer, had access to up to $774,000 in the months leading up to the 2016 presidential election, according to public records. Cohen gained access to more than half a million in cash thanks to a 2015 mortgage on a Trump Tower apartment. He and his wife were co-signers on that condo, which was owned by her parents. Cohen also got access to a max of $245,000 through a bank credit line linked to his own Manhattan apartment, the Wall Street Journal reported."

Jackson, David. “Rudy Giuliani Says Michael Cohen's Issues Have Nothing to Do with Donald Trump.” USA Today, Gannett Satellite Information Network, 9 May 2018, www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2018/05/09/rudy-giuliani-says-michael-cohens-issues-dont-affect-donald-Trump/596348002/?utm_source=feedblitz&utm_medium=FeedBlitzRss&utm_campaign=usatoday-newstopstories

Bash, Dana, and Clare Foran. “Giuliani Says Trump 'Wasn't Aware' of Cohen Pitch Promising Access.” CNN, Cable News Network, 10 May 2018, www.cnn.com/2018/05/10/politics/rudy-giuliani-michael-cohen-trump/index.html "Washington (CNN)President Donald Trump's new attorney, Rudy Giuliani, told CNN on Thursday that Trump "wasn't aware" his longtime personal lawyer Michael Cohen pitched his access to the President to potential clients following the 2016 election and landed lucrative consulting deals as a result. Giuliani also said Trump "wasn't aware of the situation in which he got money from any of that group that was mentioned originally. I doubt it. Yeah, I doubt it. He didn't know about any of the original stuff."

CBS News. “Giuliani on the Russia Probe: ‘I Want the Justice Department to Close This Thing down.’” CBS News, CBS Interactive, 3 May 2018, www.cbsnews.com/news/giuliani-on-the-russia-probe-i-want-the-justice-department-to-close-this-thing-down/ "Like Giuliani, Mr. Trump has continued to decry the special counsel's investigation into Russian election meddling and any connections to the Trump campaign. Asked if there is any evidence of a conspiracy with the Russians, Giuliani responded, "I would say none." Giuliani said there was "never any kind of agreement between Mr. Trump and the Russians to affect the election." "He had every right to fire Comey," Giuliani said. "Because of Comey's conduct. He wanted to fire him on day one. He waited."

Lynch, Sarah N. “U.S. Judge Says Mueller Should Not Have 'Unfettered Power' in...” Reuters, Thomson Reuters, 4 May 2018, www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-russia-manafort/u-s-judge-questions-special-counsels-powers-in-manafort-case-idUSKBN1I51WE

Read the Indictment: PDF - Reuters News Agency. fingfx.thomsonreuters.com/gfx/mkt/5/1605/1603/internet_research_agency_indictment.pdf

Gerstein, Josh, et al. “Judge Rejects Mueller's Request for Delay in Russian Troll Farm Case.” About Us, 5 May 2018, www.politico.com/story/2018/05/04/mueller-russia-interference-election-case-delay-570627

Differently are the:

“Portal.” Research and Educational Purpose Websites, techterms.com/definition/portal "External Portal An external portal is a website designed to be a starting point on the web. It consolidates links to different subjects and related articles, simplifying the web browsing process. Yahoo, for example, is a well-known portal that includes categories such as News, Sports, Finance, Shopping, Movies, Politics, Tech, and others. Each of these topics include links to news stories, both internal and external, to Yahoo! that you can read. In the early days of the Internet, portals were a common way for people to browse the web. However, as search engine technology improved in the late 1990s, people starting using search engines more and portals less. As a result, web portals have faded in popularity over the past few decades and only a few remain." Ex: http://doctheshow.com/ has used due diligence acknowledging the source where he found the information, block quotes are in quotation marks because of platform design, to avoid plagiarism. Contact him if you find any errors, they are for educational and research purposes without any malicious intents, non commercial and without profits. He will gladly attribute anything in error or forgotten. Citations are created by: http://www.citationmachine.net/mla/cite-a-website Plagiarism is a very complicated issue that depend on things like common knowledge, fair use, and many others; contact an attorney or someone with a degree in the area before accusing someone of plagiarism. You have to know what law or source they are relying on; or it may just be a typo or incomplete work.

“DOJ Refuses to Provide SC Scope Memo to Congress, www.tigerdroppings.com/rant/politics/doj-refuses-to-provide-sc-scope-memo-to-congress/76565714/ "The Department of Justice is declining to give top conservatives in Congress a memo Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein sent to special counsel Robert Mueller in August authorizing and outlining the scope of the Russia investigation, citing the ongoing nature of the investigation."

Debesu, Kahsay, and Andualem Eshetu. “Meaning, Nature and Purpose of Evidence Law.” Abyssinialaw.com, 4 Sept. 2012, www.abyssinialaw.com/about-us/item/932-meaning-and-nature-of-evidence-law "The law of evidence is the body of legal rules developed and enacted to govern: B. facts that may be considered in court? This is the issue of relevant evidence that one should adduce before the court to support his allegation. 1.Facts in issue 2. Facts relevant to facts in issue C. The methods of securing consideration of these facts 1. By proof i. Real (e.g. documentary, exhibits) evidence ii. Oral evidence D. At the Appeal level evidence law can be said deal with the effect of failure to comply with rules in any of the above categories of evidence law (e.g. improper admission or rejection of evidence) Because the decision of the curt regarding the admissibility or non-admissibility of evidence may form the subject of aground of appeal where an appeal is logged against conviction, discharge or acquittal [see Art 184(c of cr.p.c]. These errors on the admissibility or inadmissibility of evidence may be reversible or harmless error."

Federal Rules of Evidence, www.rulesofevidence.org/article-ii/ “Menu Table of Contents and View Article I – General Provisions Article II – Judicial Notice Article III – Presumptions in Civil Cases Article IV – Relevance and its Limits Article V – Privileges Article VI – Witnesses Article VII – Opinions and Expert Testimony Article VIII – Hearsay Article IX – Authentication and Identification Article X – Contents of Writings, Recordings, and Photographs Article XI – Miscellaneous Rules

“18 U.S. Code § 3121 - General Prohibition on Pen Register and Trap and Trace Device Use; Exception.” LII / Legal Information Institute, www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/3121  18 U.S   Code § 3121 - "General prohibition on pen register and trap and trace device use; exception US Code (a)In General.— Except as provided in this section, no person may install or use a pen register or a trap and trace device without first obtaining a court order under section 3123 of this title or under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 (50 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.)"

Electronic Privacy Information Center. “EPIC - Electronic Communications Privacy Act (ECPA).” Electronic Privacy Information Center, Https://Epic.org/Privacy/Cloud-Act/   2018, epic.org/privacy/ecpa/  "ECPA included amendments to the Wiretap Act, created the Stored Communications Act, and created the Pen Register Act. The Wiretap Act concerns interception of electronic and wire communications, which include "any aural transfer made in whole or in part through the use of facilities for the transmission of communications by the aid of wire, cable, or other like connection.” An oral communication is "any oral communication uttered by a person exhibiting an expectation that such communication is not subject to interception under circumstances justifying such expectation"; this constitutes any oral conversation in person where there is the expectation no third party is listening." "2018 Executive Agreements The Act would also permit federal officials to enter into executive agreements granting foreign access to data stored in the United States, even if that data would otherwise be protected under ECPA." "2018 Because the CLOUD Act permits data to be accessed by foreign nations based on each nation’s unique domestic procedures, data is accessible under the third-party countries law even when that law falls below human rights standards. The CLOUD Act does not itself set baseline human rights standards for foreign access to stored data. For example, the CLOUD Act does not require notice to be provided to the target of a request for data stored in the United States. "The law also permits real-time interception of communications by foreign governments on U.S. soil for the first time,"

“Premeditated - Dictionary Definition.” Vocabulary.com, www.vocabulary.com/dictionary/premeditated “something premeditated is planned in advanced and has a purpose behind it. In other words, it's no accident. A premeditated crime involves careful planning and research before it happens.”

 “Chapter 6.” Casebriefs Regents of the University of California v Bakke Comments, www.casebriefs.com/blog/law/torts/torts-study-buddy/emanuel-law-outline/chapter-6-actual-and-proximate-cause/actual-and-proximate-cause/

TheAlexJonesChannel. “Did Putin Poison A Russian Ex-Spy, Or Was It A Globalist False Flag?” YouTube, YouTube, 15 Mar. 2018, www.youtube.com/watch?v=kkCijTltIz4 "[Alex Jones] Did Putin Poison A Russian Ex-Spy, Or Was It A Globalist False Flag?"

“The Catherine Fitts Story http://www.checktheevidence.com/audio2/ET%20and%20UFO/Catherine%20Austin-Fitts%20-%20Black%20Budget%20-%20'Meeting%20Aliens'%20Coast%20to%20Coast%20-%2011%20Nov%202007.mp3 She thinks she was poisoned three times by her own US government.

Volz, Dustin. “Spy Agency NSA Triples Collection of U.S. Phone Records: Official...” Reuters, Thomson Reuters, 5 May 2018, www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-cyber-surveillance/spy-agency-nsa-collected-500-million-u-s-call-records-in-2017-a-sharp-rise-official-report-idUSKBN1I52FR [Plus] “U.S. intelligence agencies consider Section 702 a vital tool to protect national security but privacy advocates say the program incidentally collects an unknown number of communications belonging to Americans.”

Powe, Alicia, and Facebook. “Super-Secret Spy Court Raises Alarm over Feds' Snooping.” WND, www.wnd.com/2018/02/super-secret-spy-court-raises-alarm-over-feds-snooping/

“FISA Section 702.” U.S. House of Representatives Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, intelligence.house.gov/fisa-702/

FISA Section 702 Debate ALLEGATION Collect Americans.’ intelligence.house.gov/uploadedfiles/updated_setting_the_record_straight_on_section_702.pdf

“Landmark Requests the CIA, DOJ, NSA, DIA, DOS, and DOT Investigate the Leaking of Surveillance Activity Conducted in Accordance with Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court Warrants.” Landmarklegal, www.landmarklegal.org/single-post/2017/07/27/Landmark-Requests-the-CIA-DOJ-NSA-DIA-DOS-and-DOT-Investigate-the-Leaking-of-Surveillance-Activity-Conducted-in-Accordance-with-Foreign-Intelligence-Surveillance-Court-Warrants

“Obama To Trump: ‘Stop Whining’ About A Rigged Election.” YouTube, YouTube, 18 Oct. 2016, www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZPpt7-QOGKc

20 Years later, not many want “Draining the Swamp.’ Smut TV News vs Real Shit Issues!

According to the Audio, 1998, Banker Catherine Austin Fitts former Reagan administration HUD, economist, and political Website owner. Fitts was hired by the government and moved to Washington to undertake the monumental task of reforming, "draining the swamp," a scandal-ridden, fraud-plagued agency, mortgage fraud, the black budget (http://www.usdebtclock.org/), "disgraced" corporate TV news and their lies, her department to take on Clinton's "credit default swaps and financial derivatives," which contributed to the financial collapse in 2007-2008, in comparable to trillion-dollar national debt today as a balloon to cover-up, that then, and now, hocked citizen assets in US and moved then to Asia. US money was moved forever and draining the swampmay be too late for the one world government to want to absorb or pay back this debt, http://www.usdebtclock.org/. In the end, her office and computers (data) seized. Will the US properties' and US citizens' properties be seized to settle and end this latest balloon hiding financial collapse? https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/GFDEGDQ188S The world wants this war within the US pretty bad? Never denuclearize or will laser denuclearize the US by default of technology? Why is gas so dam high with more resources put on the market which is suspose to decrease price according to most economic law? $3 Cartel. Another world tax draining American income into a US National Debt. In America, in the past, when Presidents' get Peace Prizes, did not quite bring peace anywhere, but unfortunately a sign, all hell broke loose. 

Widdershoven, Cyril. “Are Russia And The Saudis Planning A Natural Gas Cartel?” OilPrice.com, 18 June 2017, oilprice.com/Energy/Energy-General/Are-Russia-And-The-Saudis-Planning-A-Natural-Gas-Cartel.html

Gertz, Bill, et al. “Get Ready for China's Laser-Weapons Arsenal.” The National Interest, The Center for the National Interest, nationalinterest.org/blog/the-buzz/get-ready-chinas-laser-weapons-arsenal-20138

“Understanding the China-North Korea Relationship.” Council on Foreign Relations, Council on Foreign Relations, www.cfr.org/backgrounder/china-north-korea-relationship "China’s support for North Korea dates back to the Korean War (1950–1953), when its troops flooded the Korean Peninsula to aid its northern ally." [Legal question: would unification remove United States off pen·in·su·la, stop joint US drills with South Korea, and the more aggressive may come in control once borders reopen?]

Westcott, Ben, et al. “White House Warns China on Growing Militarization in South China Sea.” CNN, Cable News Network, 3 May 2018, www.cnn.com/2018/05/03/asia/south-china-sea-missiles-spratly-intl/index.html One China Policy. "He said that the missiles will allow China's armed forces to form "a multilayer military umbrella over the South China Sea," with interlocking sensors and weapons systems. The same month, Australian warships en route to Vietnam were challenged by the Chinese navy as they traversed the South China Sea, leading Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull to assert Australia's right to travel international waters."

Seck, Hodge, et al. “Opinion, News, Analysis, Video and Polls.” RealClearDefense, www.realcleardefense.com/

Google Search, Google, www.google.com/search?q=THIN RED LINE&source=lnms&tbm=vid&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjCm-mZg-vaAhXqx1QKHZltDo4Q_AUIDCgD&biw=1920&bih=949 The Thin Red Line is a 1998 American epic war film part of the Guadalcanal Campaign in the Pacific Theater, World War II

In the audio, article, Fitts seemed to be framed, smeared, setup, control file on her (the dirt) invented, blackmail, evidence invented, false testimony, for her personal folder, audits, intelligence warfare, and personal investigations. The government had to force the good people out for things; for things to work. She thinks she was poisoned three times by her own government.

She talks about NSA's Echelon and Prism systems, by political opposition used against her being like an invisible alien (TROLLS) that she could not see …. 12 years later and 6 million dollars of hers, the case was dropped. She cleared her name.

According to these articles and the audio, besides political partners, NSA worked with commercial partners, invisible weaponry, aliens may be a code name she did not understand, like Microsoft, Outlook, Google, Apple, Facebook, Verizon, AT&T, Vodafone, Skype [today maybe other social media, selfies, pictures, and Twitter, maybe} and other regional and third party companies around the world for surveillance collection, saving, storing, all, most, data on individuals from online, phone calls, you do not know that many of your calls go via. internet for cost savings, social media post, emails and email history, deleted emails, search history, Geo-location information, bank records, credit card purchases, travel itineraries, text messages, deleted text messages, political affiliation, and even medical records–in secret.                      

Fitts talked about incidents of intimidation and harassment, she spoke "demonstrate or suggest that the HUD IG is deliberately leaking information to the press about its investigation of Hamilton. These leaks represent serious and persistent breaches of confidentiality, unethical and unlawful behavior and violations of Hamilton's constitutional rights."

The Catherine Fitts Story http://www.checktheevidence.com/audio2/ET%20and%20UFO/Catherine%20Austin-Fitts%20-%20Black%20Budget%20-%20'Meeting%20Aliens'%20Coast%20to%20Coast%20-%2011%20Nov%202007.mp3

“The Rush Limbaugh Show PODCAST - May 3 (2018).” YouTube, YouTube, 3 May 2018, www.youtube.com/watch?v=xmzgNltUF4I  Trump Election treated similar to Banker Catherine Austin Fitts's case twenty years ago to drain the swamp (Establishment Government). Some good points

Scheer, Robert. “Bill Clinton: The Great Deregulator.” The Nation, 29 June 2015, www.thenation.com/article/bill-clinton-great-deregulator/

How Did Credit Default Swaps Contribute to the Financial ... www.bing.com/cr?IG=8DCAB183339F49BBA6FA452D55CA15A9&CID=0ACD688E991B68552A23636F98B469BC&rd=1&h=LmV37Z5RwAFrfVw-Zs53XEi-UyuHRX2Jp6qCmW2ZFGs&v=1&r=https://www.quora.com/How-did-credit-default-swaps-contribute-to-the-financial-collapse&p=DevEx.LB.1,5539.1

Stahl, Robert G. “Target, Subject or Person of Interest.” NY NJ Stahl Criminal Defense Lawyers, www.stahlesq.com/blog/target-subject-or-person-of-interest
                                                                                                                                                                         This Website explains what is a Target, Subject or Person of Interest'; subject is a person without enough evidence to call Target. In studying law, this is where fabricating false testimonial evidence comes into play and why lawyers tell clients not to speak to anyone while not in the presence of an attorney and taking the fifth amendment from not incriminating oneself. In Rod's opinion, he is not a lawyer, some attorney’s Website, regarding the Justice Department, a federal agency, both targets and subjects may have a right to assert the Fifth Amendment right to remain silent and reluctant to testify without a grant of immunity. A witness is someone that the regime has no reason to believe has any malefactor exposure and simply has pertinent information about a perpetual investigation. A witness customarily provides a verbalization either during a field interview or at the U.S. Attorney’s Office. A witness may withal be called to testify afore the grand jury. It is often advisable for a witness to be represented by counsel as well. A witness can be charged with lying afore the grand jury or to a federal agent. They may tell you that you are not a target to circumvent a person the Fifth Amendment, but you know dam well you are the target of something, at least the subject of conversation, or those would not have such interest in you. The danger in making statements in public about a case before seeing evidence in "discovery" is tape recorded conversations by the Feds, informants, friends, lawyers talking to others, Echelon and Prism, etc. The article suggest letting a person's attorney only speak about a case in public. An attorney may get it wrong and may not be disbarred, they should already know what their recorded conversations are, especially if they are making recordings themselves, which many do, witness testimony can be challenged as hearsay, incorrect, or false, but a prosecutors wet dream would be to have a defendant testifying in public, grand jury, agent, interview, kangaroo courts with no discovery sharing process from other agencies, etc. when he has tape recordings of that person talking on a phone at the time of the incident or to somebody later saying something different. But, of course you could have got it wrong to. Sorry. "I got it wrong Mr. Officer, now here is a better memory of the incident." This happens many times in recalling events from the past. Of course, in court you can testify after disclosure of all evidence; you get to see what's on you and contest, before you testify on the witness stand. This is why some take the 5th and then testify during trial. One probably watch and demand that exculpatory evidence. There are strategic times to talk. A person should consult a licensed attorney in their state for legal advise. 

(Mock Trial, example, maybe, Expert Witness 1)

“The Reality of Repressed Memories.” Parmenides, Stage 2, faculty.washington.edu/eloftus/Articles/lof93.htm. Many researchers have created false memories in normal individuals; what is more, many of these subjects are certain that the memories are real. In one well-known study,

(Mock Trial, example, maybe, Expert Witness 2)

Lacy, Joyce W., and Craig E. L. Stark. Advances in Pediatrics., U.S. National Library of Medicine, Sept. 2013, www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4183265/. "Abstract Although memory can be hazy at times, it is often assumed that memories of violent or otherwise stressful events are so well-encoded that they are largely indelible and that confidently retrieved memories are likely to be accurate. However, findings from basic psychological research and neuroscience studies indicate that memory is a reconstructive process that is susceptible to distortion. In the courtroom, even minor memory distortions can have severe consequences that are in part driven by common misunderstandings about memory, e.g. expecting memory to be more veridical than it may actually be."

“Memory Error.” Wikipedia, Wikimedia Foundation, 10 Apr. 2018, en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Memory_error. "Types of memory errors 2.1 Blocking 2.2 Transience 2.3 Absentmindedness 2.4 False memories 2.5 Problem of bias 2.6 Misinformation effect 2.7 Source confusion 2.8 Imagination inflation 2.9 Deese–Roediger–McDermott (DRM) paradigm 2.10 Schematic errors 2.11 Intrusion errors 2.12 Time-slice errors 3 Personal life effects 4 Causes 4.1 Cognitive factors 4.1.1 Spreading activation 4.1.2 Connection density 4.1.3 Retrieval cues 4.1.4 Encoding specificity 4.1.5 Transfer-appropriate processing 4.1.6 Interference"

Making a Mountain Out of a Molehill - Phrase Meaning, Origins. www.bing.com/cr?IG=C9C5DCF893524A72B2B52D30C0C26694&CID=26ED015137C86E9F26680AB436676F08&rd=1&h=fjGGnxa7KRlERSHLr9OnyrY2UbEKXT0zBh3AP_T5RLE&v=1&r=https://www.knowyourphrase.com/making-a-mountain-out-of-a-molehill#!&p=DevEx.LB.1,5520.1 "he idea for this phrase is this: Someone takes something small, represented by the molehill in the idiom, and makes it into something big. So, for example, imagine someone wanted to enjoy some ice cream, but they accidentally dropped it on the ground, and so they threw a temper tantrum. Even though the problem was small—dropping ice cream on the ground—the person overreacted and made the problem bigger than it needed to be. Thus, one could say they made 'a mountain out of a molehill.'

Since the voicemail is deleted. Since Rod is being trolled about this over and over in the last months, let him explain. Rod has been to court two or three times, and he disclosed the prior cases with an explanation to the Judge each time; without his attorney’s consent, well without asking his attorney prior. Once he was silent with a no contest, but later explain the incident to be without any criminal intent because of circumstances, affirmative defenses. He was truthful before the Judge and Prosecutors, and his Attorneys, and had no criminal intent, Mens rea his state of mind that indicated criminal intent, in no cases. Who does not break a law in their lifetime because of the statutory requirements? Evidence of Rod’s creditability is the past Judges and Prosecutors he stood before in his past cases.

Segars, Leigh. “Evidence of Prior Convictions: Admissible Against Defendants Who Testify?” Www.nolo.com, www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/evidence-prior-convictions-admissible-against-defendants-who-testify.html "Judges will weigh, on the one hand, the value of the evidence of a prior conviction in helping the jury determine the defendant’s credibility against, Priors in Action Consider the following examples, which show how judges determine whether to admit prior convictions of testifying defendants: • A defendant is charged with murder and has a prior conviction for passing bad checks. Because the prior conviction involves a crime of dishonesty, the judge will probably allow the prosecutor to question the defendant about it. • A defendant is on trial for murder and has previously been convicted of the same. Because the prior crime is identical to the charged one, the court will determine whether evidence of it will be too prejudicial to the defendant. The risk is that the jury will believe that a defendant who murdered once must be guilty if charged again. • The charge is theft (from an employer); the court allows evidence of the defendant’s prior conviction of passing bad checks because the crimes aren’t substantially similar. Passing a check while knowing that it won’t be paid isn’t the same as swiping an employer’s cash receipts. The judge didn’t act improperly by admitting evidence of the bad-check conviction. (State v. Russell, 382 S.W.3d 312 (Tenn. 2012).)"

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Carlson, David. “Deposition.” LII / Legal Information Institute, 30 June 2017, www.law.cornell.edu/wex/deposition "A deposition is a witness's sworn out-of-court testimony. It is used to gather information as part of the discovery process and, in limited circumstances, may be used at trial. The witness being deposed is called the "deponent."

Bergman, Paul, and UCLA. “Formal Discovery: Gathering Evidence for Your Lawsuit.” Www.nolo.com www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/formal-discovery-gathering-evidence-lawsuit-29764.html "Learn about discovery -- the legal procedures used to gather evidence"

Bergman, Paul, and UCLA. “Discovery: What and When the Prosecution Must Disclose.” Www.nolo.com, www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/what-when-the-prosecution-must-disclose.html "Discovery: What and When the Prosecution Must Disclose Discovery—the information about the other side’s case—is supposed to promote fair trials and case settlement. Learn how it works."

Cont’d at end of writing.

-------------------------------------

He asks that she does not call him again in the future. Rod has not had a personal call from an undergraduate student in more than ten years when he was taking classes. In the same period, he has not operated on a personal basis with any students at UNLV. That was classwork, of course, a decade ago. Rod has not attended any classes over the last year.

The "false narrative" may have been to disprove or prove differently that: "Rod does not collect or sell data from your visits or use of this Website." He wrote that last week at the start of the page. A phone call is a way in which data transfers.

The young lady described herself as a junior at UNLV, proving her age, and thanked Rod for donating a gift to UNLV this year, but she never said what Rod donated, nothing as far as he knows this semester or school year, for some time, and that she appreciated it because it provides resources for students like her, and they look forward to contacting Rod next school year for the same gift. She was vague and never mentioned what gift. It could have meant D.O.C. The Show, which is not connected to UNLV and not a gift; or as a way of providing data, she said that the resources not only allow students like her to pursue their passions but also provide "resources" that her fellow "Rebels" relied on to see their way to success.

Her phone call could be verification for someone that someone representing UNLV, speaking on a large group of people behalf, making use of something Rod owns, and that they wanted future gifts or cooperation or usage and they agreed to some sort of usage or gift of resources for next semester for some group of people at UNLV. Someone may holler collusion, but collusion is not a crime. Or, it could be narrated as a salacious flirt with some young student, since no gift ever happened.

This could have been a very simple communication in which Rod could applaud as some folks loving his work, but Rod thinks it was more than that. It better to call out uncertainty or unsurely when they happen or one may find out later that your suspicions were correct.

The first people Rod is familiar with in awarding, congratulating, awards, scholarships, and thank-you for students, independent academic or faculty, and graduate Research work is Lied Library. Maybe she works for Lied Library or is an affiliate. Some people gift their research work to Universities. 

5/8/2018 Rod has only seen two black male students working most of the semester, many semesters, for this entire large body of people at Lied Library, security hired another black male this semester, late, when Rod complained seeing none in about 10 years or never, maybe, to their chief of security, at least that he has seen at Lied. Note, he has not been there, and is not there, and will not be there, every minute of the year, for years. Today they have removed the large cast of members from the front page of their Website, and put a picture of a black male student using computers working, as a hiring tool, or maybe for some other impressive reason. It is good that they are recruiting black males for next semester. 

losangeleslawyersnow. “3 Tips When Under Investigation | Know What To Do If You Are Under Investigation.” YouTube, YouTube, 24 May 2015, www.youtube.com/watch?v=jHGYNyovIys.

Associated Press. “Tech Companies Not Hiring Blacks despite Ownership Rates.” LasVegasSun.com, 3 May 2018, lasvegassun.com/news/2018/may/03/tech-companies-not-hiring-blacks-despite-ownership/?_ga=2.80412055.1299701408.1525546847-2081530980.1525546847 "Morial said that the latest Equal Employment Opportunity reports filed by Google, Facebook and Twitter showed..."Historically, while great industrial breakthroughs have profited our nation, African Americans have often been exploited, rather than elevated by these advancements," he said. "Fortunately, the digital revolution is still in its youth and ripe with potential for black Americans." The National Urban League also released its "equality index," which like the digital inclusion index, is based on nationally collected data from federal agencies including the Census Bureau, the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the National Center for Education Statistics and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention"

“UNLV Libraries Receives Grant to Launch Latino Voices Project.” MD Program | UNLV School of Medicine | University of Nevada, Las Vegas, www.unlv.edu/news/release/unlv-libraries-receives-grant-launch-latino-voices-project "National Endowment for Humanities awards UNLV Special Collections and Archives $100,000 to document contributions of Latino Communities to Southern Nevada's development."

5/6/2018 Unrelated, Rod heard an older Spanish gentleman teaching a lady, inside of Lead Library, she did not work there, to teach others to say United States, but do not say USA, United States of America, and do not say the pledge, because these other States belong to Mexico or Spain not America.

“Radical Professors Must Stop Forcing Their Views onto Students.” UNLV Scarlet & Gray Free Press, 27 Mar. 2017, www.unlvfreepress.com/radical-professors-must-stop-forcing-views-onto-students/ "There seems to be no separation between college education and politics. If you oppose your professor’s political views, you better be ready to take the heat that is coming your way. This is especially prevalent in English, communications and women’s studies classrooms where it seems that the majority of professors liberal. You can’t even log on to the school library website without being presented an “Anti-Oppression Guide” on the home screen. If you look deeper into that guide, you will find documents there such as a “Syllabus for White People to Educate Themselves.” Yeah, that’s not racist at all. Apparently, things aren’t racist when they’re about white people. There are some useful documents there, but some are radical. Just like the pages about “White Privilege,” “The White Radical Frame,” and “The DJT Resistance.” On the other side of the political spectrum, UNLV history professor Michael Green made comments on his Facebook in February calling President Donald Trump a “syphilitic Nazi in the White Man’s House.” During the interview, the student described the professor as being radically opinionated and unable to handle any sort of challenging views presented to him. At the start of the semester, this professor told the class that they would have to “deal with” some of his “Marxist views”."  

Playing devils-advocate, this would be taking a "False Narrative" in which you wanted to disprove by fabricating a vague recorded message that could imply many things and when put with other evidence, fabricated or not, could create a real but "False Narrative." She read the message from a script of paper. This leads into what Rushbo, Rush Limbaugh, was talking about reviewing Comey's book; an interview. 

Rushbo book reviewed that Comey talked about a group of FBI building narratives (false), and supplying evidence, sometimes keeping the good and hiding the bad when the group should have talked about investigating cases and let the evidence be the guide of what happened in cases.

The book review talked about the team of Mueller doing the same in past investigations with building (false) narratives and providing evidence in cases, which was revealed that they left out exculpatory evidence, or withheld evidence to make the (false) narrative work, in cases in which many of their biggest cases were overturned, thousands of people lost jobs, and a few people died innocently in jail. Millions were awarded to victims.

Rod has studied similar cases or seen the movies. When corruption from people working for the government seeps into cases, the investigation should be halted and dismissed. Judges may strike a case down if you can prove corruption from the parties prosecuting you. Rod assumes, as long as they are still part of the team or have provided evidence to the case, the case is forever tainted, impure, contaminated, polluted, dirty, etc. You see those movies where people get trapped in lying, illegality, tax, security, other fraud, and turn informant states evidence, say what is convenient, and tape record every damn body in their tight circle. 

It becomes too difficult to tell what is and is not tainted. Simply, someone creates a (false) narrative of what they want to prove. They may already have illegal tape recordings or evidence gained illegally. Then they keep the cases going long enough to find evidence or testimony to substantiate the illegal evidence, or fabricate evidence by fabricating scenarios, fabricating testimony which many times is fabricated false testimony to fit the (false) narrative, adverse tape recordings may be fabricated or pretended to be secretly made between different parties as real not admissible evidence, to make the case fit the (false) narrative. Old similar instances of same incidents that did not violate law between parties at the time, may be revamped to fit the (false) narrative that a law was violated recently if you can find someone to testify falsely about the incident from several years ago. The goal may be to correlate one case to another case in which they really want to prove but not yet substantiated any precedent cases establishing any violation of laws. The time of the incident may be omitted to make old incidents seem recent and exculpatory evidence may be omitted by limiting testimony in a court proceeding or hearing refuting the witness statements. Example, the recent Zuckerberg testimony was allowed not under oath by Congress, he said he, his company, was working with special counsel FBI, but Cambridge Ana. and the Cambridge University continued to put out press release evidence proving his statements false, there had been implied consent, silence and inaction, from Facebook for years on their work, and even participatory acts in research by some of Facebook employees; and Obama's Campaign work in 2012, very similar to their work, as they said, Cambridge did not even use the past data collected in the 2016 election. 

Kraus, Rachel. “Cambridge Fires Back at Zuckerberg's Accusations, Basically Says GTFO.” Mashable, Mashable, 12 Apr. 2018, mashable.com/2018/04/12/cambridge-university-responds-to-zuckerberg/#9j.pt2TbBgq4

Lomas, Natasha. “Cambridge University Hits Back at Zuckerberg's Shade.” TechCrunch, TechCrunch, 16 Apr. 2018, techcrunch.com/2018/04/12/cambridge-university-hits-back-at-zuckerbergs-shade/

Government, Transcript courtesy of Bloomberg. “Transcript of Mark Zuckerberg's Senate Hearing.” The Washington Post, WP Company, 10 Apr. 2018, www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-switch/wp/2018/04/10/transcript-of-mark-zuckerbergs-senate-hearing/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.67954e12ab9d

Kosoff, Maya. “Zuckerberg Quietly Moves 1.5 Billion Users' Rights Out of Europe's Reach.” The Hive, Vanity Fair, 19 Apr. 2018, www.vanityfair.com/news/2018/04/mark-zuckerberg-quietly-moves-15-billion-facebook-user-rights-out-of-europes-reach [1.5 Billion]

David, Javier E. “Cambridge Analytica Pushes Back on Facebook's Allegations as Top Senate Democrat Blasts 'Wild West'.” CNBC, CNBC, 17 Mar. 2018, www.cnbc.com/2018/03/17/cambridge-analytica-denies-using-facebook-data-for-trump-campaign-says-its-cooperating-with-the-social-network.html

             No, Rod does not work with any police department and no, he is not an informant. But, he will report folks that discriminate against him to the proper agencies.

             After the 2016 election, Rod began being trolled by many social media companies working within or with maybe NSA's Echelon and Prism systems. There was one narrative that many tried to push after the election; that anyone not supporting Hillary campaign were supporting Russia and many tried to fabricate false evidence to prove it. Out of 15 years of Rod being involved in developing social media platforms, this had never happen before, before this political loss. Over the years Rod had the suspicious person he blocks following him on Twitter each month or two, but no real group of people conspiring together to fabricate false evidence.

             He gets trolled and harassed some on the internet. Some try to tell him they know some secret, "blackmail-you-hush-now." Rod does not have any big secrets that he does not talk about in his books. He wrote about trolls trying to create and fabricate false evidence on YouTube in his music search with Russia propaganda videos, no he did not click, his Twitter list two months with Russia propaganda and fake list, he finally was able to delete the empty list, he has not used Facebook for around seven years or that would probably have fabricated Russia propaganda Russian advertising, closed the Twitter and Facebook said it would close itself.

Associated Press. “Tech Companies Not Hiring Blacks despite Ownership Rates.” LasVegasSun.com, 3 May 2018, lasvegassun.com/news/2018/may/03/tech-companies-not-hiring-blacks-despite-ownership/?_ga=2.80412055.1299701408.1525546847-2081530980.1525546847 "Morial said that the latest Equal Employment Opportunity reports filed by Google, Facebook and Twitter showed..."Historically, while great industrial breakthroughs have profited our nation, African Americans have often been exploited, rather than elevated by these advancements," he said. "Fortunately, the digital revolution is still in its youth and ripe with potential for black Americans." The National Urban League also released its "equality index," which like the digital inclusion index, is based on nationally collected data from federal agencies including the Census Bureau, the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the National Center for Education Statistics and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention"

Afterward closing his Twitter accounts, and retirement from most social media, and he no longer had time to manage his list that he created at Twitter. He got messages each day that he had around 180 unread messages just on one of his accounts, 7 - 10. He did not read those DMs and messages on his Twitter accounts. The accounts stay available for thirty days before actually closing. Rod could have reopened the accounts in those thirty days. He did not personally communicate with anyone with messages on daily basis. Twitter kept sending him emails to check messages. He finally blocked Twitter on this email, he stopped checking the rest. He was not going to check all those damn messages, maybe trolls, on his different accounts. You, see what he means. So, it is not too many ways people can contact Rod. Rod was mostly business. Trolls mess up his blog pages every now and then, but he copies and paste them back in 2 minutes from his many backups.

That leaves only his public phone number. He got a couple. There is that Tracfone that calls him with the same, almost the same, with a number or two difference, same phone number as his phone. The trolls call about twice every week or so and hang-up without leaving a message. He does not answer that phone number because it has the same, almost the same, as his. He sure they leaving some type of false phone record trail to keep calling or troll messaging. Fabricating a paper-trail. The only other suspicious call was on tax day, April 15, 2018. Trolls are generally people. This article by SMOSH describes 18 types of internet trolls:

             “The 18 Types Of Internet Trolls.” SMOSH, webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:dIdvD12m77EJ:www.smosh.com/smosh-pit/articles/18-types-of-internet-trolls &cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us.

           Generally, some trolls attempt to send secret messages. For example, if someone was to really troll President Trump, they may threaten to arrest his business lawyer, and send him a stiff message on April 15th day, with Comey's great interview rant against him on April 15th day. But, collusion itself is not a crime. April 15th, could mean someone  has viewed his financial records, tax history, business dealings, and have him tape recorded.

Apuzzo, Matt. “F.B.I. Raids Office of Trump's Longtime Lawyer Michael Cohen; Trump Calls It 'Disgraceful'.” The New York Times, The New York Times, 9 Apr. 2018, www.nytimes.com/2018/04/09/us/politics/fbi-raids-office-of-trumps-longtime-lawyer-michael-cohen.html

“HEADLINERS: James Comey' Airs Sunday, April 15 on MSNBC.” MSNBC, NBCUniversal News Group, 10 Apr. 2018, www.msnbc.com/originals/headliners-james-comey-airs-sunday-april-15-msnbc

“CNN, MSNBC Have given Stormy Daniels Lawyer Michael Avenatti $175 Million in Earned Media.” Fox News, FOX News Network, 11 May 2018,www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/05/11/cnn-msnbc-have-given-stormy-daniels-lawyer-michael-avenatti-175-million-in-earned-media.html?cq_ck=1526058351859

Berry Law Firm. “How Do I Fight a Search Warrant?” Berry Law Firm, 2 Mar. 2017, www.jsberrylaw.com/blog/2017/march/how-do-i-fight-a-search-warrant-/

            (*Note: Someone contacted Rod's storage unit people, he thinks suspiciously about, but no break-ins or Raids on the 15th; delayed maybe. Nothing there. Flea market junk. Sorry.)


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                (Mock Trial: Discovery)

“10 Common Mistakes That Trial Lawyers Make (Part 2).” The Ehrlich Law Firm, 23 Mar. 2015, www.ehrlichfirm.com/news-stories/10-mistakes-trial-lawyers-make-2.html "10 Common mistakes that trial lawyers make that can lead to appellate disaster, and how to avoid them (Part 2)"

“Question: Can I Appeal If My Trial Lawyer Was Incompetent?” Sanders Criminal Law, 16 May 2016, www.sanderscriminallaw.com/appeal-if-lawyer-incompetent. "It should be noted that if you are convicted and sentenced in respect of a criminal offence, you have 30 days from the date of sentence to appeal both the conviction and the sentence (after which you require leave of the court). Generally speaking, a conviction appeal will only be successful if the trial judge made an error of law or misapprehended evidence in a way that if he or she had not done so, the result might have been different. In the case of a jury trial, the judge must have erred in law, say, in admitting important evidence that should have been excluded (or vice-versa) or in erring in instructing the jury on an important point of law or evidence. As to sentence appeals, they will generally only succeed if the sentence is “unfit”. 
The range of what constitutes a “fit” sentence can be broad."

“Inadequate Legal Defense.” Northwestern Pritzker Law, www.law.northwestern.edu/legalclinic/wrongfulconvictions/issues/defense/ Appealing a lawyer’s incompetence: "The exonoree's lawyer at trial or on appeal provided obviously and grossly inadequate representation. **The failures of defense counsel are overwhelmingly sins of omission, especially the failure to investigate."

England, Deborah C. “Affirmative Defenses in Criminal Cases.” Www.criminaldefenselawyer.com www.criminaldefenselawyer.com/resources/criminal-defense/criminal-defense-case/affirmative-defense.htm "Sometimes a criminal defendant is entitled to acquittal even though the prosecution has proven every element of the charged offense. This happens when the defendant has successfully raised and the jury has accepted an “affirmative defense” that operates by law to exonerate him. Common affirmative defenses include a plea of insanity, self-defense, mistake of fact, intoxication (in some situations), duress, contributory negligence, entrapment, and the running of the statute of limitations (the time period, starting when the crime occurred, during which a prosecution must begin)"

Staff, LII. “Entrapment.” LII / Legal Information Institute, 13 Apr. 2015, www.law.cornell.edu/wex/entrapment "Entrapment An affirmative defense in which a defendant alleges that police officers acquired the evidence necessary to commence a criminal prosecution of the defendant by inducing the defendant to engage in a criminal act which the defendant would not otherwise have committed. see, e.g. Jacobson v. United States, 503 U.S. 540(1992)"

“Legal Dictionary - Law.com.” Law.com Legal Dictionary, dictionary.law.com/Default.aspx?selected=211 "clean hands doctrine n. a rule of law that a person coming to court with a lawsuit or petition for a court order must be free from unfair conduct (have "clean hands" or not have done anything wrong) in regard to the subject matter of his/her claim. His/her activities not involved in the legal action can be abominable because they are considered irrelevant. As an affirmative defense (positive response) a defendant might claim the plaintiff (party suing him/her) has a "lack of clean hands" or "violates the clean hands doctrine" because the plaintiff has misled the defendant or has done something wrong regarding the matter under consideration. Example: A former partner sues on a claim that he was owed money on a consulting contract with the partnership when he left, but the defense states that the plaintiff (party suing) has tried to get customers from the partnership by spreading untrue stories about the remaining partner's business practices."

Debesu, Kahsay, and Andualem Eshetu. “Evidence Law in Civil and Criminal Cases.” አቢሲኒያ ሎው, www.abyssinialaw.com/study-on-line/item/936-evidence-law-in-civil-and-criminal-cases

Morgan, Edmund M. “Hearsay and Non-Hearsay.” Harvard Law Review, 1 May 1935, www.jstor.org/stable/1332586?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

“State v. Clovis.” Justia Law, law.justia.com/cases/kansas/supreme-court/1991/64458-2.html  "The State appeals the dismissal with prejudice of two counts of a multiple-count complaint as a sanction for the State's failure to comply with a discovery order to disclose the identity of a confidential informant. … was working as an undercover informant for the Salina Police Department and made a controlled buy of two pounds of methamphetamine"

“Disclosing a Confidential Informant – Case of the Week #2.” HateJail.com, www.matthewglassmanlaw.com/blog-1/2016/4/11/disclosing-a-confidential-informant-case-of-the-week-2 "With a law enforcement “handler” not present, a CI can use whatever method they want to attempt to entice or pressure someone to engage in criminal activity. This is troubling and brings us to this week’s case of Mr. Hill v. State"

Special Report, oig.justice.gov/special/0509/chapter3.htm. "The Federal Bureau of Investigation's Compliance with the Attorney General's Investigative Guidelines (Redacted) Special Report September 2005 Office of the Inspector General Chapter Three: The Attorney General's Guidelines Regarding the Use of Confidential Informants. Criminal Prosecution of Informants. FBI Misconduct Relating to Informants. The Benefits and Risks of Using Confidential Informants in FBI Investigations."

Staff, LII. “Rule 901. Authenticating or Identifying Evidence.” LII / Legal Information Institute, 5 Dec. 2011, www.law.cornell.edu/rules/fre/rule_901 "(6) Evidence About a Telephone Conversation. For a telephone conversation, evidence that a call was made to the number assigned at the time to: (A) a particular person, if circumstances, including self-identification, show that the person answering was the one called"

Porter, Tom. “Martin Luther King's ‘Abnormal’ Sex Life of Orgies, Hookers... and Joan Baez-the Newly Released JFK File Reveals All.” Newsweek, 5 Nov. 2017, www.newsweek.com/declassified-jfk-file-details-fbi-sex-smears-about-martin-luther-king-701996 "When we look closely at this, what we see is that there is a person who is trying his best to damage Martin Luther King's reputation"

[Rod’s legal question: Haven't man-hatter black widows, women hustlers, and the FBI put together false and unsubstantiated dossier claims against political opposition and wealthy men for a long time in History?Back to MLK? Back to Jesus? Now these profits, collusion, intimidation and lies can all but grow with the help of the right movements? "Public Fed up with Disgraced news reporting lies since 1985, at least!" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eKHZAC8p9pU ]

[If the strategy is to bring a preponderance of witnesses testifying, maybe falsely, on similar incidents, there has to be an alternate account and each person refuted because they never happened or misunderstood the incident if you are innocent and of course Rod would take the stand; let it fly, as he says. He does not understand why more people do not take that stand and testify to what really happened when they say they are innocent. After the jury deliberate, is a little late to add evidence to your case for an appeal.]

Snider, Brett. “Are Confidential Informants Credible? 5 Factors Courts Will Consider.” FindLaw Blotter, blogs.findlaw.com/blotter/2014/09/are-confidential-informants-credible-5-factors-courts-will-consider.html

Peter, Benjamin. “Avoiding an Online Prostitution Sting.” Guides - Avvo, 29 Oct. 2014, www.avvo.com/legal-guides/ugc/avoiding-an-online-prostitution-sting  "how police officers set up online prostitution stings to lure unsuspecting "johns" into a situation where they can be arrested for solicitation. Despite being known as the world's oldest profession, prostitution is thriving more than ever because of the Internet and websites like Craigslist and Backpage. Police officers know this and routinely setup online prostitution stings to try to crack down on this type of activity."

[Rod’s legal question: Could women pros, sex workers, adult sex stars, informants, and materialistic women premeditated set up wealthy men to pay large sums of money for sex acts, hush money, extortion, do they have the skills, legal connections and protections, and many seem to have a lot of knowledge in sex-accusation law?]

United States v. Giglio United States v. Ruiz Ruiz. www.bing.com/cr?IG=1D019EF9A9B64B9DA843376770573800&CID=2A112481D6FC67DA20792F65D75366DF&rd=1&h=UCb9O_5tFE4W-tKX0Wk6gfyCDB3_1t7X51wAmoDxBfw&v=1&r=https://www.aclu.org/sites/default/files/pdfs/drugpolicy/informant_proposedlegislation.pdf&p=DevEx.LB.1,5364.1

Tran, Jessica. “What Is Admissible Evidence?” What Is Admissible Evidence? | LegalMatch Law Library, 11 Apr. 2018, www.legalmatch.com/law-library/article/what-is-admissible-evidence.html

Staff, LII. “Federal Rules of Evidence.” LII / Legal Information Institute, 25 Sept. 2015, www.law.cornell.edu/rules/fre "Hearsay is generally inadmissible, since the judge or jury is unable to form an opinion regarding whether the person making the out-of-court statement is reliable. Multiple exceptions to the hearsay rule exist, and a defendant’s own out-of-court statements are excluded from the definition of hearsay entirely."

Study.com, Study.com, study.com/academy/lesson/inadmissible-evidence-definition-law-lesson.html

“Texts as Evidence: Electronically Stored Information in Court.” Law Offices of Andrew D. Myers, attorney-myers.com/2014/05/texts-as-evidence/

“Admissibility of Electronic and Digital Evidence in Court.” Slater and Zurz, 27 July 2017, slaterzurz.com/admissibility-of-electronic-and-digital-evidence-in-court/

Staff, LII. “Rule 803. Exceptions to the Rule Against Hearsay.” LII / Legal Information Institute, 1 Dec. 2017, www.law.cornell.edu/rules/fre/rule_803

Staff, LII. “Rule 402. General Admissibility of Relevant Evidence.” LII / Legal Information Institute, 1 Dec. 2011, www.law.cornell.edu/rules/fre/rule_402  "Rule 402. General Admissibility of Relevant Evidence Relevant evidence is admissible unless any of the following provides otherwise: The United States Constitution; a federal statute; these rules; or other rules prescribed by the Supreme Court. Irrelevant evidence is not admissible."

Gurnani, Neerja. “Relevancy and Admissibility.” Academike, 16 Jan. 2015, www.lawctopus.com/academike/distinction-between-relevancy-and-admissibility/

Harvard Law Review, harvardlawreview.org/

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Rushbo "Narrative" theory may support that "The Taxes were the Narrative." The team put together was a financial team, Ex-ENRON forced bankruptcy and dissolution of their business consultant's business, Arthur Anderson Accounting firm. An investigation, "The Narrative" had to eventually get to what Trump refused to talk about before the 2016 Election "taxes." Clinton showed her tax return, but Trump would not. The woman drama didn't stop Trump in 2016 and nothing substantially shows that America cares who screwed who in the past; wouldn't in 2020. A lot of men and women get a piece of "tail" on the side. Women cheat too. Hillary hollered about Russia before 2016 election and nothing substantial shows that America cares today. The email hack could have as well been a leak from someone in the Democratic party to third-party to Russia or wikileaks; a lot of leaking from within in the 2016 Election. It may be Democrats own contributory negligence for inadequate, question-ability of shortage of evidence, allowing for that one doubt, even if preponderance of evidence, by not allowing the FBI to examine the server for forensics evidence, at time the crime was alleged. What you got to hide is the question. Another computer server issue? Fraud, obstruction of justice, or those Tax Records and business dealing; may be the thing that could stop Trump. So, if such should fruition? Long legal battle. In some's opinion, with so much corruption already, a great defense, only a fool would fire Mueller or anyone else from this investigation! But, Washington is full of self-destructive fools and 10 cent TV lawyers, not attorneys, but journalist pretending to be so. Maybe starting a new investigation "anew" erasing all the corruption in the case, De Novo. That does not get rid of the case, it starts a new investigation based on obstruction instead of winding down this possible frivolous investigation. The email leak:

http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2017/01/the-fbi-reportedly-never-examined-the-dncs-hacked-servers.html                 

https://www.wired.com/2017/01/fbi-says-democratic-party-wouldnt-let-agents-see-hacked-email-servers/

“Evidence-Fabricating in Asymmetric Conflicts: How Weak Actors Prove False Propaganda Narratives.” Taylor & Francis, www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/1057610X.2017.1283199?scroll=top&needAccess=true

Hattem, Julian. “Rand Paul Calls for Removal of CIA Director.” TheHill, The Hill, 1 Aug. 2014, thehill.com/policy/technology/214128-rand-paul-calls-for-cia-chiefs-ouster “It is illegal for the CIA to spy on Americans and an affront to our republic to spy on the Senate,” Paul said. “Brennan told the American people that the CIA did not spy on the Senate but now he admits that they did.”” Leaders of the congressional Intelligence committees have also declined for the spy chief to be removed from office, even while denouncing the hacking incident.”

If he was an attorney, Rod’s top ten Interrogatories, you get twenty or more sometimes, to all witnesses would be, making them fit somehow or notha:

What was the date you first started working for the Government as an informant? Was it before the election? Date? Are you or anyone with you wearing a wire now?

Have you and if so, when did you make the first tape recording and are they all made within the state(s) law? Provide all transcripts? Provide a list of any and all documents and filings?

List any and all contacts you have had with other witnesses or their attorneys? List any and all things you been offered, or have received, in return for your testimony; ie. Book deals, TV or commercial paid appearances, all monies donated, paid, or solicited not paid, bribes, and all monies promised or mentioned to you for the future?

List any and all previous lawsuits, or complaints, against you or that you have filed against someone else?

Why no public mention of that incident until after you got a lawyer? Was it because it only matches statutory/case law?
                                                                                                                                                                                                      But, can someone really see your tax records without your permission? Yes. Rod thinks so. If someone knows the right people, they can get that information without you knowing it. Case in point. Rod did file a complaint about it. Rod ethics professor at UNLV, Spring 2015, was a fun guy. Rod thought he was the gossip cop that hinted he knew everything going on at UNLV. He was very intelligent and testified as an expert witness at times for finance. The second day he called out Rod’s old occupation decades ago and something off Rod’s tax records that he would have to had seen to know that exact number or he was just that good. Rod had police, and maybe, FBI in the classroom. UNLV is a law enforcement school and of course, they would be in an MBA Ethics class. Rod got a "B" out that class. He is just an average student. 

            The professor told the class of a case in which he testified against another great professor at another University for someone in a huge land deal. One person testified that their financial records, statements, maybe tax records, were fine and the other testified that the same records were not fine. I guess the moral of the story is that you can find an expert witness to review the same information and have opposite opinions.

            Rod’s tax records are fine. He may have sent in a wrong form or made a minor misstatement but his taxes are pretty simple. He has not evaded any taxes or fudged any numbers. He records loans as loans and revenue as revenue. But, he did inquire a tax return from the IRS in 2017, a printout to add to some paperwork he was filing. He was very surprised to see they had some information that he was unfamiliar with, like a $6000 or so deduction for computer, and a few others all about computers that served him no benefit to claim. He already has enough write-offs and credits. That is kind of steep for a laptop. His original filings, original copies, does not have this $6,300 deduction and other computer information that has been added. He amended this return on April 15, 2018, Tax Day, 1040x, requesting they remove this information because it misrepresented his business activity during this year, 2016. He guesses it was just karma that he would wait to the last minute and a contact; maybe someone rejoicing about it or maybe someone trying to frame him for wire-fraud, ridiculous, or change his business and business tax situation. Almost. Almost. He has requested 2015, filed in 2016, twice, latest received in May 2018, and they do not show his business activity in 2015 that he filed on the original like 2017 shows, but they do show he filed taxes. He will be following this up in the next 60 to 90 days.

He never claimed those figures before. He retrieved printouts on the rest of his returns for the last four years and they seemed okay. They have correction forms for mistakes on your tax returns. Rod would advise anyone to get copies to assure they are what you submitted and no additions. Just go to IRS Website and they come in 5 to 10 days. He won’t claim a conspiracy theory attempt by someone to link him to some type of wire or tax fraud or get a FISA warrant to search his tax returns with those additions. 

June 15, 2018 Rod received the 4th requested transcripts from the IRS for 2015, 2016, and 2017 filed 2016, 2017, and 2018. The 2015 transcript that looks like / showed he filed taxes was not sent this time, but a duplicated of a statement letter for 2017 was sent in its place. So no further information was sent on 2015 filing. The 2016 filing changes were made but not what Rod requested, the attribution for the $6300 tax credit per computer still remain, but without any amount. Rod did not want this credit and will ask that the words be removed. This business never had any over the internet or online sales. He did not receive any information of 2017, other than they did not receive, or unsure, of his health coverage waiver which he sent. They requested that be resolved, probable to see if he has copies of tax returns. Another agency also at the same time, sent a letter requesting information about business for 2017-2018; "0." There was no business other than what he filed on his tax returns. Yes. He will file the same with them. Yes. He has a copy of 2015 also. He will be following this up in the next 60 to 90 days.

TIMELINE: was, is, someone trying to frame Rod?

FBI Directory (Interim) Andrew McCabe (Acting), May 9, 2017 - August 2, 2017

FBI Directory James B. Comey, September 4, 2013 - May 9, 2017

FBI Directory Christopher Wray, August 2, 2017 - Present

In Rod’s vision, in hindsight, of course, some may call them dreams, and some may think they dramatizations, and some may think, etc. God Analytics was to bring in the "Coming of Christ." The spirit world has no vision of Presidential Elections beyond the coming of Christ. So, Rod knew it was retirement time. God Analytics had vision for Bush Jr. to win, Obama to win, and only one term for President Trump to win, but no other candidates for the future was revealed. God Analytics was through the spirit world, the mind and God, not the internet, and not building databases. One term Trump may be or not be the case. Only one term was seen in God Analytics, the Spirit World, Rod talking to God, and many others communicating to God. One Prophet did see two terms. When the other analytics, such as data, harvesting, and polling, the great Democratic database built on Facebook, and on other sources, in 2012 Election and boasted, worshiped, by some Democrats to never loose another election, failed and prove to continue to fail and be unreliable, not the added-value claimed, not the reach claimed, not the number of impressive impressions paid for by advertisers, not the psycho-hypnotics claimed, this story ended. Anybody can build a database, collect names and tell you for example, that a couple lines of your writing impressed 4 million people, now how much will you pay for that. They should have gave praise to God; God Analytics.

      Happy Tax Day

God Analytics

Mcfarlan, Emily. “Inauguration Speaker Franklin Graham: God Allowed Donald Trump to Win.” Stltoday.com, 7 Jan. 2017, www.stltoday.com/lifestyles/faith-and-values/inauguration-speaker-franklin-graham-god-allowed-donald-trump-to-win/article_92b4da36-4d18-5d27-bb53-4062491296a4.html.

2016 Election

2016-2017 Rod's Tax Returns were changed by someone at the IRS to change Rod's business model, business activity, from a fruit business to a computer business, to look like he could be selling data, similar to this incident which never happened: 

Kraus, Rachel. “Cambridge Fires Back at Zuckerberg's Accusations, Basically Says GTFO.” Mashable, Mashable, 12 Apr. 2018, mashable.com/2018/04/12/cambridge-university-responds-to-zuckerberg/#9j.pt2TbBgq4

Lomas, Natasha. “Cambridge University Hits Back at Zuckerberg's Shade.” TechCrunch, TechCrunch, 16 Apr. 2018, techcrunch.com/2018/04/12/cambridge-university-hits-back-at-zuckerbergs-shade/

David, Javier E. “Cambridge Analytica Pushes Back on Facebook's Allegations as Top Senate Democrat Blasts 'Wild West'.” CNBC, CNBC, 17 Mar. 2018, www.cnbc.com/2018/03/17/cambridge-analytica-denies-using-facebook-data-for-trump-campaign-says-its-cooperating-with-the-social-network.html


2018: before tax time this incident occurred where false testimony was accused given by a company and a University that was accused of improperly collecting and selling data:

Government, Transcript courtesy of Bloomberg. “Transcript of Mark Zuckerberg's Senate Hearing.” The Washington Post, WP Company, 10 Apr. 2018, www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-switch/wp/2018/04/10/transcript-of-mark-zuckerbergs-senate-hearing/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.67954e12ab9d

Kosoff, Maya. “Zuckerberg Quietly Moves 1.5 Billion Users' Rights Out of Europe's Reach.” The Hive, Vanity Fair, 19 Apr. 2018, www.vanityfair.com/news/2018/04/mark-zuckerberg-quietly-moves-15-billion-facebook-user-rights-out-of-europes-reach [1.5 Billion]

Associated Press. “Tech Companies Not Hiring Blacks despite Ownership Rates.” LasVegasSun.com, 3 May 2018, lasvegassun.com/news/2018/may/03/tech-companies-not-hiring-blacks-despite-ownership/?_ga=2.80412055.1299701408.1525546847-2081530980.1525546847 "Morial said that the latest Equal Employment Opportunity reports filed by Google, Facebook and Twitter showed..."Historically, while great industrial breakthroughs have profited our nation, African Americans have often been exploited, rather than elevated by these advancements," he said. "Fortunately, the digital revolution is still in its youth and ripe with potential for black Americans." The National Urban League also released its "equality index," which like the digital inclusion index, is based on nationally collected data from federal agencies including the Census Bureau, the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the National Center for Education Statistics and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention"

2018: Rod made this post on his Website:

Rod no longer used Twitter list, and Rod wrote this on his Website: "Rod does not collect or sell data from your visits or use of this Website." Rod never sold any computer data.

2018: before tax time this incident occurred where false testimony was accused by a company and a University that was accused of improperly collecting and selling data:

2018: Rod got a telephone call which false statements were made and again tried to change Rod's business model, business activity, to being associated with the University and Rod’s business, much like Cambridge analytics selling data and Cambridge University being the sponsor of some of their research.

May have been a statement trying to go back in time by making more false statements that some event occurred. You see 

1)      Rod never heard the narrative from Twitter. They testified behind closed doors. Rod never harvested any data, but, need not say, someone that did not understand Twitter list, someone may have said so. He definitely never sold any data which was one of the big deals in the above cases. He never accessed any personal data as a developer only what was in the public domain. But, Twitter had problems after Rod stopped using Twitter: 

      Finkle, Jim. “Twitter Urges All Users to Change Passwords after Glitch.” Reuters, Thomson Reuters, 4 May 2018, www.reuters.com/article/us-twitter-passwords/twitter-urges-all-users-to-change-passwords-after-glitch-idUSKBN1I42JG

MailOnline, Mark Prigg for. “Privacy Backlash as Twitter Starts to Snoop on EVERY App Users Have on Their Phone.” Daily Mail Online, Associated Newspapers, 27 Nov. 2014, www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2851166/Privacy-backlash-Twitter-starts-snoop-app-users-phone.html

Hoffman-Andrews, Jacob. “New Twitter Policy Abandons a Longstanding Privacy Pledge.” Electronic Frontier Foundation, 25 May 2017, www.eff.org/deeplinks/2017/05/new-twitter-policy-abandons-longstanding-privacy-pledge

Associated Press. “Tech Companies Not Hiring Blacks despite Ownership Rates.” LasVegasSun.com, 3 May 2018, lasvegassun.com/news/2018/may/03/tech-companies-not-hiring-blacks-despite-ownership/?_ga=2.80412055.1299701408.1525546847-2081530980.1525546847 "Morial said that the latest Equal Employment Opportunity reports filed by Google, Facebook and Twitter showed..."Historically, while great industrial breakthroughs have profited our nation, African Americans have often been exploited, rather than elevated by these advancements," he said. "Fortunately, the digital revolution is still in its youth and ripe with potential for black Americans." The National Urban League also released its "equality index," which like the digital inclusion index, is based on nationally collected data from federal agencies including the Census Bureau, the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the National Center for Education Statistics and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention"

2)      There had been implied consent, silence, and inaction, for Rod to build list for many years. Someone without knowledge of list, may have tried to analogize that to collecting data. There is data in each list. There is data in every conversation between man.                                                                                                                                 

3)      No one ever said to Rod that there was a problem with him building Twitter list. He built them for many years. That is why they are a part of the service. They were never blocked to the public. They have buttons to make them public or private personal. It is kind of late to bring up subject, after he stop building them, retired from them and Twitter, and they are deleted.

       Exhibit A: Voice Message Transcript


          Exhibit B: Tax Transcript Section

Amended U.S. Individual Income Tax Return filed April 15, 2018.
https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/f1040x.pdf


Rodney Jackson second request, 2018, for copy of 2016 tax return. 1st request and received in 2017.



{This company was Rod’s MBA New Venture project in correlation to what he was learning in the classroom. The adjusted gross income off Schedule C, Profit or Loss, states Principle Business “Fruit Sales.” The business was brick-and-mortar, part-time promotional big-tent retail sales, promoting fresh fruit and vegetables’ in the community. It did not open every week but was located at 2930 N. Las Vegas Blvd. NV. 89036. It had a separate Website that never got out of the development stage and had no over the internet nor online sales. Several hundred dollars were attributed to it from the main company for cost associations. The brick and mortar sales tax were filed as a separate entity than the developmental Website which was registered. It was left passive during 2017 for informational and developmental purposes for Rod, 0 sales, and closed later that year never getting out of the developmental phase. Once more, the total business taxes were the Schedule C Principle Business “Fruit Sales” brick-and-mortar and Schedule C did not state they were attributed to a computer, but from the above location and the gross income sales was not from computer internet sales, definitely no data information sales, as it was attributed to by the IRS “Adjusted gross income per computer.” Rod will be requesting additional printouts, correspondence, and copies from the IRS, and State Sales Tax Office, because of some other things that he noticed. He was waiting for Tax Day 4/15/2018 to follow up. This should take about 60 to 90 days. At the minimum, it may be just a difference in communication.}

          
          Exhibit C: God's Analytics Win Chart


Rod is not politically correct and definitely, does not follow minds of young ill-informed millenniums. They can make a lot of money, but some are possessed by elders trying to get that money.

World Mission Society Church of God, Korean-based, at UNLV 4/25/2018 with their usual entourage of about 8 - 12 members canvasing campus and they do not tell you who they are; church name. They have traveled to UNLV many weeks for past three years recruiting members. They come out between 6 PM AND 10 PM generally. They are diverse, multicultural, millenniums very young in age, Black, Spanish, Asian, and White. The women wear fine dresses and men wear fine suits and tie, most very well spoken, articulate, and affluent.

But, they have one thing in common. They attack other Christians for not being a part of their belief and church and from Rod's interviews, they have those characteristics described in the below article; called cult by many. They believe that God the Mother, and they read you a section of the Bible, preach the word, but they do not tell who they are recruiting, that a living 75-year-old lady in Korea is God, God The Mother, and her dead husband of decades is the new name for Jesus, Ahnsahnghong. He is Christ and followers of Christianity has to follow his new name; it is not Jesus. They tell you Asians, something about the Bible say "East" are the Jews, chosen people, which their rationalizing someone thinking they are God, and Jesus returned. 

Bailey, Megan. “Former Atheist Mark Zuckerberg Finds Religion.” Facebook CEO on Faith | Atheist Gets Religion | Finding God - Beliefnet, Beliefnet, Inc. and/or Its Licensors, www.beliefnet.com/faiths/articles/former-atheist-mark-zuckerberg-finds-religion.aspx

When asked, they will tell you they believe this. So Rod is short on calling them a con. The article says many are hypnotized. One shouted to Rod, she, the living Korean lady, is God.

Invest in their companies, make that money, but be careful about following ideas of ill-informed "some millenniums" on religion or their politics. Their politics may be controlled by adverse religions outside of America, interfering with American politics, controlling America politics.

“Former Members Allege New Jersey Church, South Korea-Based World Mission Society Church of God, Is Actually a 'Cult'.” PEOPLE.com, people.com/celebrity/ex-followers-say-south-korean-church-is-mind-control-cult/

"Psychological control tactics"

“Micromanaging” member’s life and money"

"Ahnsahnghong – who died in 1985 – was the second coming of Christ, and together, Ahnsahnghong and Jang Gil-ja are jointly known as “Elohim God.”

 The World Mission Society Church of God does not recognize Christmas or Easter, denounce Sunday Christian worship as work, claims membership in more than 175 countries, with over 150,000 worshippers in the U.S. alone. They have been seen in UNLV student union.

           The article says they target young Caucasians who appear wealthy, and their members dispatch multiple times a week to malls or colleges for recruiting drives. 

Moore, Art, et al. “Zuckerberg-Funded Charity Supports Radical Islamic Groups.” WNDwww.wnd.com/2017/03/zuckerberg-funded-charity-supports-radical-islamic-groups/

Concha, Joe. “GOP Rep to Zuckerberg: 'Diamond and Silk Is Not Terrorism'.” TheHill, 11 Apr. 2018, thehill.com/homenews/media/382654-gop-rep-to-zuckerberg-diamond-and-silk-is-not-terrorism

Following the money trails of international investments; maybe payoffs or bribes:

Bader. “Facebook Profits Increase by 50% in First Quarter Earnings.” Breaking112, 26 Apr. 2018, breaking112.com/facebook-profits-increase-by-50-in-first-quarter-earnings/

“U.S. Facebook Advertising Revenue 2018 | Statistic.” Statista, www.statista.com/statistics/544001/facebooks-advertising-revenue-worldwide-usa/

 “Twitter: Global Mobile Advertising Revenue 2018 | Statistic.” Statista, www.statista.com/statistics/255756/twitters-worldwide-mobile-internet-advertising-revenue/

This article states that political sites are filtered, Islam related:

“Meet Twitter's Second Biggest Shareholder, Saudi Prince Alwaleed Bin Talal - BBC Newsbeat.” BBC News, BBC, 8 Oct. 2015, www.bbc.co.uk/newsbeat/article/34474798/meet-twitters-second-biggest-shareholder-saudi-prince-alwaleed-bin-talal

“Mark Zuckerberg Plays down Facebook Role in Arab Uprisings.” The Telegraph, Telegraph Media Group, 25 May 2011, www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/mark-zuckerberg/8537011/Mark-Zuckerberg-plays-down-Facebook-role-in-Arab-uprisings.html

“Facebook Says It Gave Huawei and Other Chinese Firms Access to User Data.” CNNMoney, Cable News Network, money.cnn.com/2018/06/05/technology/facebook-huawei-china-data-sharing/index.html "Facebook says it has provided access to its users' data to Huawei, a Chinese smartphone maker that US intelligence agencies have described as a security threat. Facebook (FB) on Tuesday said it has been operating data-sharing partnerships with four Chinese device makers...In January, an effort to get AT&T (T) to sell its smartphones collapsed at the last minute. Then in February, top officials from the CIA, NSA, FBI and the Defense Intelligence Agency said at a Senate hearing that they would recommend against American citizens using products made by Huawei and ZTE (ZTCOF).""Facebook (FB) on Tuesday said it has been operating data-sharing partnerships with four Chinese device makers that enabled the companies to recreate Facebook-like experiences for their users."

Cont’d at end of writing.

Fitts wrote about incidents of intimidation and harassment, she wrote "demonstrate or suggest that the HUD IG is deliberately leaking information to the press about its investigation of Hamilton. These leaks represent serious and persistent breaches of confidentiality, unethical and unlawful behavior and violations of Hamilton's constitutional rights." The DOJ lawsuit was unsealed, qui tam lawsuit, whistleblower, 1,400-day investigation, 1,340 days longer than the 60 days authorized by Federal False Claims Act from false accusation submitted to a government agency, DOJ.

“The Catherine Fitts Story http://www.checktheevidence.com/audio2/ET%20and%20UFO/Catherine%20Austin-Fitts%20-%20Black%20Budget%20-%20'Meeting%20Aliens'%20Coast%20to%20Coast%20-%2011%20Nov%202007.mp3

Dowbenko, Uri. “The Catherine Fitts Story (1).” Scoop - Independent News, www.scoop.co.nz/stories/HL0202/S00013.htm

KC, Karthikeyan. “NSA's ECHELON: The Predecessor of PRISM.” Geekswipe, Geekswipe, 27 Nov. 2017, geekswipe.net/technology/nsa-echelon-the-predecessor-of-prism/

“PRISM (Surveillance Program).” Wikipedia, Wikimedia Foundation, 18 Apr. 2018, en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PRISM_(surveillance program)

“Project Phoenix.” Project Phoenix | SETI Institute, www.seti.org/seti-institute/project/details/project-phoenix

“ECHELON Today: The Evolution of a NSA Black Program.” Secret Mind Control in Sweden and World Wide, 2 Aug. 2013, mindcontrolinsweden.wordpress.com/2013/07/30/echelon-today-the-evolution-of-a-nsa-black-program/

Privatizing VA is the first step to closing the Veterans Hospital. No thanks. You cannot pull the wool over our eyes and put us with all those some corrupt corporate bottom line dollar doctors without us protesting. A Soldiers death, injuries, old age, and VA is about Honor, which they give, not prestigious private doctors whom want someone to honor them. Enjoyed the writing. It is the experience. Rod.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Social Media as a Utility 

Can you follow this? Did a group of people actually take a problem in the now, May 2018, with 200 possible violating a policy, a normal, implied consent, maybe actual consent also, violation, allowed by the company for four years, and, like, backdating a law or backdating an accounting record or backdating a check or backdating a medical record or similarly backdating an actual event, four years, 2014 to before an incident occurred that others try to correlate a similar, 2016, but false incident narrated to have occurred that never happened, to attempt to circumvent ex post facto law, to act on? If you could, you may question the voice message, delete, and the change in Rod’s tax positions with false documents by someone else, and false testimony with the voice message on gifts, correlating, the data selling business model and the college relationships of Cambridge University to UNLV, tying to deep money pockets for possible legal action maybe by Congress and/or Government agent, Facebook, or Twitter?

It could appear necessary to find Russia guilty of a whole lot to push public demand or acceptance for change and new controls and legislation over their use of social media, maybe making social media a utility for each user bringing in more revenue for government by charging the end user for more privacy; which has not happened yet?

“Social Media as a Public Utility.” Wikipedia, Wikimedia Foundation, 21 Apr. 2018, en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_media_as_a_public_utility  Social media as a public utility is a theory which argues that social networking sites (such as Facebook, LinkedIn, Google , Google Search and Twitter, etc.) are essential public services that should be regulated by the government, in a manner similar to the way electrical and phone utilities are typically government-regulated. Applying utility-status regulation to social media websites has been a debated topic within Internet policy since 1992.[1]

PCmag. “Facebook Suspends 200 Apps in Post-Cambridge Analytica Audit.” Fox News, FOX News Network, 14 May 2018, www.foxnews.com/tech/2018/05/14/facebook-suspends-200-apps-in-post-cambridge-analytica-audit.html

 “Facebook Users Would Have to Pay for Total Privacy, Sandberg Says.” Fortune, Fortune, fortune.com/2018/04/07/sheryl-sandberg-says-facebook-users-would-have-to-pay-for-total-privacy/

“Ex Post Facto Law.” Wikipedia, Wikimedia Foundation, 12 May 2018, en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ex_post_facto_law  "An ex post facto law (corrupted from Latin: ex postfacto, lit. 'out of the aftermath') is a law that retroactively changes the legal consequences (or status) of actions that were committed, or relationships that existed, before the enactment of the law. In criminal law, it may criminalize actions that were legal when committed; it may aggravate a crime by bringing it into a more severe category than it was in when it was committed; it may change the punishment prescribed for a crime, as by adding new penalties or extending sentences; or it may alter the rules of evidence in order to make conviction for a crime likelier than it would have been when the deed was committed. Such legal changes are also known by the Latin term in mitius. Ex post facto laws are expressly forbidden by the United States Constitution in Article 1, Section 9, Clause 3 (with respect to federal laws) and Article 1, Section 10 (with respect to state laws)."

Stewart, Emily. “What the Government Could Actually Do about Facebook.” Vox, Vox, 10 Apr. 2018, www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2018/4/10/17208322/facebook-mark-zuckerberg-congress-testimony-regulation "After Cambridge Analytica and the continued information drip out of Facebook over what Russia did in 2016, public outcry may also push reluctant legislators to be more open to acting. The Honest Ads Act would require social media companies to disclose which groups are running political advertisements and make reasonable efforts to ensure foreign governments and agents aren’t purchasing ads on their platforms. On Friday, Zuckerberg came out in support of the Honest Ads Act in a Facebook post, saying it would “raise the bar for all political advertising online.” Twitter announced its support for the legislation on Tuesday." "One big sticking point in regulating Facebook in America is the First Amendment Part of what explains why the United States has been so reluctant to enact regulations on the internet and technology is the matter of free speech, as mandated by the US Constitution. Simply put, there is a lot the government just can’t control when it comes to what people do and do not say online."

YouTube, YouTube, 5/14/2018 Rush Limbaugh Podcast 5/14/2018 SHOW Rush Limbaugh May 14 2018 HOUR 1-2. https://tinyurl.com/y8x8us9g OR https://www.google.com/search?q=Rush+Limbaugh+May+14+2018+FULL+SHOW&oq=Rush+Limbaugh+May+14+2018+FULL+SHOW&aqs=chrome..69i57j69i61.247j0j4&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8 

Preview 2016 - 2018: Setting people up, planting, framing, manufacturing complexities, spies, Universities’, fabricating evidence, false realities, creating crimes when there are no crimes, Trump supporters, and government agencies.

Vazquez, Maegan. “Giuliani: 'Nothing Illegal' about Trump Campaign Looking for Clinton Dirt with Russians.” CNN, Cable News Network, May 2018, www.cnn.com/2018/05/17/politics/rudy-giuliani-campaign-dirt/index.html.

Devaney, Jason. “Rush Limbaugh: 'Phony' Russia Probe a Case of Entrapment.” Newsmax, Newsmax Inc. Newsmax Inc., 15 May 2018, www.newsmax.com/newsfront/investigation-no-collusion-entrapment-fbi-sting-operation/2018/05/15/id/860530/. "The conservative radio host talked about the Russia probe on his radio show Monday and claimed to know who the FBI planted in the Trump campaign — although he would not reveal the person's name. Limbaugh said the mole helped jumpstart the investigation into Russian collusion, which he indicated began when former Trump campaign associate George Papadopoulos got drunk in a London bar and told an Australian diplomat the Russians had some of Democrat Hillary Clinton's missing emails." "Papadopoulos was entrapped by three people, including the person who is reputed to be the spy," Limbaugh said. "George Papadopoulos, 24-year-old peripheral member of the Trump foreign policy campaign team. He was a nothing. He was a nobody, which made him a perfect mark. He was a young guy who wanted to go places." "The scheme, according to Limbaugh, involved paying Papadopoulos $3,000 to write a paper on Turkey and Cyprus and buying him a plane ticket to London. The meeting with the Australian ambassador was set up in advance, Limbaugh said, and Papadopoulos was led to believe by someone that the Russians had dirt on Clinton." "After that, the informant gets hold of the Australian ambassador and suggests to him that he meet Papadopoulos at a London bar, which happened," Limbaugh said. "Papadopoulos gets liquored up, gets drunk — this is factually known, it's been reported — and Papadopoulos starts bragging to the Australia ambassador, 'Hey, did you know that the Russians have thousands of emails?'" "Papadopoulos passed this information along as though it were his own. He was just trying to fit in. He was just trying to be a big guy. . . . He was fed this information." "The whole thing was a setup. It was perfect entrapment 101."

                            

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Is Framing Someone for a Crime a Crime? - 

https://www.quora.com/Is-framing-someone-for-a-crime-a-crime

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------

Rothberg, Daniel. “At UNLV, Whistleblowers Call for Accountability in Military Drone Program.” LasVegasSun.com, 30 Mar. 2016, lasvegassun.com/news/2016/mar/30/whistleblowers-accountability-military-drone-unlv/.

Before the election, in 2016, D.O.C. The Show was very successful with many political people from all parties, pretty much equal at the time, the first attempt of maybe entrapment or frame for Rod was with one of Snowden allies, Attorneys, Christopher Aaron, a former counter-terrorism officer for the CIA’s drone program and Jesselyn Radack, director of the Whistleblower & Resource Protection Program who was invited to UNLV. Posters were placed in the bathroom stalls that Rod took craps in. He never saw that before and never after. Of course, Rod did not attend, he thought someone, a small network of individuals, was setting him up for something suspicious, maybe they worked for the government, US Gov. Rod has never had any personal contact with any Russian connected folks.

Above, Rushbo talked about other conservatives being entrapped or framed by informants, agents, and double agents in some cases 2016 and 2017. Money, maybe a motive?

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Harry Reid had a lot of friends and enemies in Congress:

Rice, Frances. “8 Times Obama's Intelligence Agencies Set People Up To Fabricate The Russia Story.” BLACK REPUBLICAN BLOG, 1 Jan. 1970, blackrepublican.blogspot.com/2018/06/8-times-obamas-intelligence-agencies.html "5. Brennan Shops Dossier To Harry Reid Former CIA Director John Brennan, who may have been the U.S. intelligence official to first push an investigation into the Trump campaign, briefed then-Sen. Harry Reid on the Clinton-funded dossier in August 2016. The briefing did two things: First, it lent some legitimacy to the dossier, and second, it got Reid to pressure the FBI to not drop the investigation. The briefing had the added bonus of allowing Reid to speak publicly about Trump’s ties to Russia, as if he had just gained access to groundbreaking proof of collusion, which was of course covered by the media."

“Sen. Harry Reid Joins UNLV Boyd School of Law as Distinguished Fellow.” MD Program | UNLV School of Medicine | University of Nevada, Las Vegas, www.unlv.edu/news/release/sen-harry-reid-joins-unlv-boyd-school-law-distinguished-fellow 04/10/2017 
          Simultaneously, April 21, 2017, a new a multicultural center opened that spring 2017 at UNLV. The picture of the Jihad Woman in the diversity office was something that was hidden; emboldened maybe by the 2016 Election to come out into the light to show itself several months before Christmas. Politics crept into Rod’s and other students’ “student union” sewing discord. An office made a quick entrance and set up in 2017 with a grand ceremony. The opening in the UNLV student union. Rod knew it was political already before the doors opened, on the first floor high traffic zone, not the second floor, not the third floor, three glass cases down from all the representatives of the Board of Regents pictures, affirmation is the question given, two glass cases down from pictures of UNLV sports, affirmation being the question given, the place where student-guides show parents and new student prospects expectancy, before they put up a Christmas tree decorated with political statements, before the “thangs taken” attacking Thanksgiving was beside their office in the first glass show case from Thanksgiving 2017 to January 2018, before the students left that office on school walk out day with orange “jail house shirt color” saying, written, something like “act-up” “talk-back,” #Resist (ance), before the upward to a dozen or so black and white older homeless men, non-students, non-alumni, allowed to agitate, sleep in the main part first floor of the student union on a daily basis, before the woman at one of the food places that hire generally Hispanic solely said she did not like to hire black and white because they are like those homeless men, lazy, before Rod saw the Jihadist woman on the diversity wall, before more signs surrounded the campus “freedom or death”, before seeing two older ladies, one black and one white or Hispanic, one with a Ph.D., a title linked to Provost, a multicultural center, safe-space, to run the office in the student union, schmooze with other departments, notable one of Rod’s MBA bosses, that was a time, before the mid-age Hispanic gentlemen that looked like the person heading up a segment at the 2017 Nevada Progressive Summit at CSN, the Community College of Southern Nevada, that said he was from UNLV walked into the student union office, before the mural painted, football homecoming, on the student union windows celebrating the one-knee attacking the American Pledge, American Flag, American Military, maybe, Christmas, maybe, before the Las Vegas shooting, before a lady from the facility that discriminates against Christmas  in public place, Lied Library, visited the student union office, before the grand opening of this office, before that same facility that discriminate against Christmas, put flyers from the multicultural office on their counter, and before the Christmas clock went silent Christmas 2017, by the vast number of dignitaries, staff, guest political speakers, and administrators present. But, Rod paid for that student union, he volunteered, voted it in, paid fees, and it had not been a place for politics, but enjoyable to relax in, politics-free they still say! It had been! The clock. Tic. Toc. Tic. Toc. The politics were creeping. Sewing discord.

You saw it. You see it. You know, you believe, they have discriminated against Christmas decorations again, maybe in a public space. They did not discriminate against other secular Holidays in the same area.

You take your complaint to the Compliance Diversity Office. It may be part of the EEOC complaint handling at your school. There is a stout gentleman of Asian descent, maybe. He did not have a Latin accent. 

On the wall, you see a poster that they are interested in transvestite discrimination, but nothing about the Christian religion, or secular Christmas. Nothing ever forced the building facilitators to comply.

Another year pass. You saw it. You see it. You know, you believe, they have discriminated against Christmas decorations again, maybe in a public space. They did not discriminate against other secular Holidays in the same area.

You take your complaint to the Compliance Diversity Office. This time you see, a woman with a gun on her back on the wall as you enter the Office of Compliance of Diversity Initiatives with the words “Obey” but at the end of the gun there was a daisy, pushing up flowers or daisies means “death” and at the other end "peace." You interpreted this as saying, “Peace through the barrel of a gun killing Christians.” If it had a rose flower, you might have interpreted as meaning ending violence and peace. But, it was not. She did not have a burqa, but a hijab, and scarf wrapped tightly around her face so you could only see the whites of her eyes, like men seen in many terrorist videos on CNN and Fox News. She did not have a "rose" as a flower. Creeping Sharia. Nothing forced the building facilitators to comply.

You also notice that the outside clock in public that has rung out Christmas songs for years, suddenly silenced this 2017 Christmas. Nothing forced the building facilitators to comply. The clock is closest to the UNLV Boyd School of Law. 

You already filed a religious discrimination complaint with The Office for Civil Rights, OCR, for education the other year. Nothing forced the building facilitators to comply. The discrimination is creeping from one facility to another.

“History of Muslim Brotherhood Penetration of the U.S. Government.” The Counter Jihad Report, 17 Mar. 2015, counterjihadreport.com/history-of-muslim-brotherhood-penetration-of-the-u-s-government/

“Mark Zuckerberg Plays down Facebook Role in Arab Uprisings.” The Telegraph, Telegraph Media Group, 25 May 2011, www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/mark-zuckerberg/8537011/Mark-Zuckerberg-plays-down-Facebook-role-in-Arab-uprisings.html

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Background

Reed (Senator Intelligence Committees) Hillary (Secretary of State) Facebook Zuckerberg (Arab Spring)

Arab Spring and the Muslim Caliphate were very much the same. The Caliphate was to remove all non-Muslim government from the Arab and Northern African peninsula; and put Muslim governments in charge. The ruler of Egypt, Mubarak, a non-Muslim, was overthrown and jailed. He supported Christians. He was replaced by the Muslim Brotherhood, Morse. John McCain and Graham were two of the first dignitaries to visit Morsi and recognize the Government. They began persecuting Coptic Christians and the world outcry caused the Egyptian military to overthrow the government and put Mubarak supporters back in control. Qaddafi, a non-Muslim in the belief of many because his mother was of Jewish descent and married a Muslim, and the Koran says Muslims have to marry Muslims, was overthrown and killed. Different Muslim sects control and stole a large part of the citizen wealth and stipends from oil sales. Syria Assad was also non-Muslim and supported a large group of Christians living in Syria. Christians go back thousands of years in Syria. They all were painted as horrible men. Maybe they were. But, they all were non-Muslim. Russia stopped the Caliphate in Syria. Maybe, they are horrible too. But, they are non-Muslim and mostly Christian. Maybe, you too, are horrible.

CNN. “Clinton: Trump Supporters in 'Basket of Deplorables...” YouTube, YouTube, 9 Sept. 2016,www.youtube.com/watch?v=OZHp4JLWjNw (1/4 of voters)  {{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{Many Democrat Leaders and Republican Leaders 2016-2017 Sowed Sexist and Racial Discord, normalizing it for many Americans, Universities, high schools, mainstream social medias, advertising, sporting events, television, and even other countries}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}                                    

“'He Has an Affinity for Dictators': Clinton Rips Trump, Says 'Pressures' Caused White Women to Vote for Him.” Fox News, FOX News Network, 13 Mar. 2018, insider.foxnews.com/2018/03/12/hillary-clinton-rips-donald-trump-affinity-dictators-putin-white-women-gop-india-today “Purie asked Clinton why she believes more than 50 percent of white women voted for Trump in 2016. Clinton said Democrats have been losing the Caucasian vote, and already "do not do well with white men." "We don't do well with married, white women [either]," she said. "Part of that is an identification with the Republican Party and [an] ongoing pressure to vote the way that your husband, your boss, your son... believes you should."” {{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{Many Democrat Leaders and Republican Leaders 2016-2018, Sowed Sexist and Racial Discord, normalizing it for many Americans, Universities, high schools, mainstream social medias, advertising, sporting events, television, and even other countries}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}

“Rush Limbaugh Podcast Thursday - May 31, 2018.” YouTube, YouTube, 31 May 2018, www.youtube.com/watch?v=XK7o8S9998s. Informants-Spies, Gowdy, Drive-by fake news, Pardons by President Trump of many of Comey's past convictions, the best of Liberal LGBT women nasty racism sexist gutter quotes "feckless C-word" "slut-walk" "Nasty-woman" "in the media is okay? Trump was the Target? Not really. Really?

Persons, Sally. “Sen. Mark Warner Texted with Lobbyist with Russian Ties to Get in Touch with Dossier Author: Report.” The Washington Times, The Washington Times, 9 Feb. 2018, www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/feb/9/mark-warner-texted-with-lobbyist-with-russia-ties-/.

Mark Robert Warner Businessman and politician was named to the Senate Intelligence Committee in 2011. “United States Senate Select Committee on Intelligence.” Wikipedia, Wikimedia Foundation, 1 June 2018, en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Senate_Select_Committee_on_Intelligence

U.S. Senate, Clinton Committee on Armed Services (2003-2009) United States Senator from New York from 2001 to 2009 and 67th U.S. Secretary of State from 2009 to 2013

                                            Price, Greg. “Bill Clinton Met Vladimir Putin Instead of Top Russian Nuclear                                                                        Official.” Newsweek,  27 Oct. 2017, www.newsweek.com/clinton-russia-uranium-deal-689321

“United States Senate Select Committee on Intelligence.” Wikipedia, Wikimedia Foundation, 1 June 2018, en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Senate_Select_Committee_on_Intelligence "• Mark Warner, Virginia, Vice Chairman • Dianne Feinstein, California, • Richard Burr, North Carolina, Chairman • Marco Rubio, Florida • Ex officio • John McCain, Arizona • Chuck Schumer, New York"

“Report: Soros Money Funding Fusion GPS.” American Thinker, www.americanthinker.com/blog/2018/03/report_soros_money_funding_fusion_gps.html “Mr. Warner used Mr. Waldman as a go-between to reach Mr. Steele, a former British spy to whom the committee wants to speak. The back-and-forth from Warner to Waldman to Steele did not appear to be productive. Mr. Deripaska, in an op-ed in the Daily Caller, does not touch on Steele but on Fusion and Daniel J. Jones, an ex-intelligence staffer for Sen. Dianne Feinstein, California Democrat. Mr. Jones now runs his own investigative firm, Penn Quarter Group, and has been in contact with Fusion, which is still trying to bolster the disputed Steele dossier. Mr. Deripaska discloses that Mr. Waldman testified before the Senate Intelligence Committee, and thus Mr. Warner. He said he testified that Mr. Jones told Mr. Waldman that Mr. Soros was funding Fusion. He writes, “Yet on March 16, 2017, Daniel Jones — himself a team member of Fusion GPS, self-described former FBI agent and, as we now know from the media, an ex-Feinstein staffer — met with my lawyer, Adam Waldman, and described Fusion as a ‘shadow media organization helping the government,’ funded by a ‘group of Silicon Valley billionaires and George Soros.’ My lawyer testified these facts to the Senate Intelligence Committee on Nov. 3.” Mr. Deripaska’s column contended that Washington’s Russia narrative is all wrong.”

“Explaining the Presidential Self-Pardon Debate.” National Constitution Center – Constitutioncenter.org, National Constitution Center, constitutioncenter.org/blog/explaining-the-presidential-self-pardon-debate “In the case of former President Richard Nixon, he was granted a pardon by President Gerald Ford for any crimes he might have committed during the Watergate scandal, even though Nixon wasn’t charged with or convicted of federal crimes. (This is known as a pre-emptive pardon.) Nixon was able to receive a pardon under the precedent of an 1866 Supreme Court ruling called Ex parte Garland, which allowed for a pardon granted by President Andrew Johnson to remain in force for a former Confederate politician. But Judge Richard Posner, another widely cited legal authority, said in a 1999 book about the Clinton impeachment that the question was left open by the Founders. “It has generally been inferred from the breadth of the constitutional language that the president can indeed pardon himself,” Posner argued. And Samuel Morison, a pardon attorney who specialized in that subject at the Justice Department, told the Washington Post last May that a self-pardon could theoretically be done by a President. “My opinion is that in theory that he could. But then he would be potentially subject to impeachment for doing that,” Morison said. “There are no constraints defined in the Constitution itself that says he can’t do that.” But just before Nixon’s resignation, the Justice Department Office of Legal Council issued its own memo on the subject, on August 5, 1974. “Under the fundamental rule that no one may be a judge in his own case, the President cannot pardon himself,” said Mary C. Lawton, Acting Assistant Attorney General. That didn’t mean that a President couldn't find a way to receive a pardon and continue in office. “A different approach to the pardoning problem could be taken under Section 3 of the Twenty-Fifth Amendment. If the President declared that he was temporarily unable to perform the duties of his office, the Vice President would become Acting President and as such he could pardon the President. Thereafter the President could either resign or resume the duties of his office,” Lawton said.”

Cheney, Kyle, et al. “Sessions Argued in Clinton Impeachment That Presidents Can Obstruct Justice.” About Us, POLITICO, 4 Dec. 2017, www.politico.com/story/2017/12/04/jeff-sessions-president-obstruct-justice-bill-clinton-278517

Engler, Robert Klein. “Remembering Chris Stevens: an Ambassador Betrayed.” New, Headline News, Breaking News, canadafreepress.com/article/remembering-chris-stevens-an-ambassador-betrayed “Hillary Clinton stood before the coffin that held the cold, dead body of US Ambassador Christopher Stevens and blamed his death on a video that supposedly insulted Muslims. If telling a lie is not a betrayal, then what is?” The attack staged for September 11, 2012 glorified the date 9 11, 2001, killing of American patriots, but covered-up. Was not the Las Vegas shooting an attack glorifying 9 11? Visit the memorial, "Route 91,"it tells a lot. Some say there was an attempt to cover this up, also, killing of American patriots. Entrap, entrapment, and frame?

athanasakis1974. “The Rush Limbaugh Show Podcast Monday - Jun 04, 2018.” YouTube, YouTube, 4 June 2018, www.youtube.com/watch?v=ONuwYaxjksM Motive Motive Motive Motive Entrap Entrapment Frame

Rasmussen_Poll. “50% Think Senior Law Enforcement Officials Broke the Law to Block Trump Presidency.” Rasmussen Reports, www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/general_politics/february_2018/50_think_senior_law_enforcement_officials_broke_the_law_to_block_trump_presidency

/pages/Terry-Jones/1013177832041982. “Most Think Obama White House Spied On Trump Campaign, Want Special Counsel: IBD/TIPP Poll.” Investor's Business Daily, Investor's Business Daily, 6 Feb. 2018, www.investors.com/politics/editorials/most-think-obama-white-house-spied-on-trump-campaign-want-special-counsel-ibdtipp-poll/

Kahn, Chris. “Most Republicans Believe FBI, Justice Dept. Trying to...” Reuters, Thomson Reuters, 6 Feb. 2018, www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-russia-poll/most-republicans-believe-fbi-justice-dept-trying-to-delegitimize-trump-reuters-ipsos-poll-idUSKBN1FP2UH

The closing statement? Opinion? Opportunity? Means? Motive? Intent?

The closing statement? The closing argument? The closing arguquestions? In the above evidence, you looked at and read the links, right? You saw President O denounce any thought of Election 2016 being rigged by anyone, two weeks before the election because he thought Hillary would win? You heard Comey testify on television that he thought Hillary would win and he ran his department if she was going to win? You heard about the text message from the lady working under Comey, that they had Russia to fall back on?

Would not that mean that Russia plan, then was the Narrative Plan A? And after the Election, the plan could not stay the same, because Hillary lost, so after the Election, the Russian Plan A would have to change to a different narrative, Narrative Plan B?

One can say, looking at the above evidence, can you theorize to say that Narrative Plan A was set into play early in 2016 with the attempted contact with Rod? He rejected! Narrative Plan A was to go after Russia that interfered with the Caliphate and social media would be the choice of the big stick?

From Rod’s own accounts in the above evidence, algorithms from social media companies were attempting to entrap him before the election? Facebook, as well as many social media, worked with the government in different programs before the 2016 Election? Would Facebook not know Russia had bought so many ads, as they say, they were already working with the government, but they too thought Hillary was supposed to win, Narrative Plan A?

According to FaceBook and the FBI report from the government, did they not say Russian advertising was targeting, algorithms target those that may have interest or likes or subjects of interest, of Trump, Bernie, and Stein, the green party, all that opposed Hillary, but because of algorithms maybe not really her supporters anyway?

And if the above sentence is true, if there with clicks required, were there not being a database history, capturing, connecting, and maybe entrapping, or later entrapping, those who unknowingly knew they were paid for by Russia, Narrative Plan A? Remember, on YouTube, similar click history were attempted to be built on Rod, but he did not click? If Rod had Facebook, would he have received the same ads? But, Rod very seldom click any ads, so maybe neither do others?

Thus if there was Narrative Plan A, there were no Russian companies sowing seeds of discourse before Narrative Plan A fail, Hillary lost? The text about Russia fall back plan was then Narrative Plan B? Switching Narrative Plan A because it no longer fit because Hillary lost but the plan was already complete by the time Election Day 2016 came?

Legal surveillance agencies collect data, evidence, and may prosecute violations of laws within the rules of evidence, proper ethics, and is trusted by society in most cases? We honor these people, military, and first respondents. Then there is another network within these well-respected agencies of people? But, there is a network that could form in any agency that are not to be honored? Those that fabricate false evidence, plant false evidence, entrap innocent victims, create false narratives and create crimes when there are none, and frame innocent citizens?

From the evidence above, Narrative Plan A, entrap, entrapment, frame, is it not through their own contributory negligence, that it can even be argued that they, themselves, through third parties, leaked their own email(s), to Russia and Wikileaks, framing a scenario that would favor Hillary, not Trump, because they all thought she would win even with the leak, and this would set the narrative to go after Russia, which they did, as evidence, when she lost, Narrative Plan B, but possible war if she had won, Narrative Plan A? They leaked a lot of information in the above evidence, Plan A turned into Plan B. Sessions was the optimal Attorney General, you may had firm belief he would not become part of the network, against Americans, and his recusing was brilliant, it laid no foundation that there was conspiring between White House and Top of the AG in the Russian probe, which his actions would maybe be seen as obstruction and case anew, voiding evidence which is now argued, for the new case, which may even become irrelevant in impeachment proceedings, if he did act upon stopping the investigation? Any future AG may be seen as intentional action to obstruct the investigation if they should do so? The person in charge of the investigation or Congress would probably have to end this investigation for it not to become possible obstruction charges for an impeachment proceeding to take place? Obstruction anew, obstruction is a different issue than the Russian Probe?

From the evidence above, Narrative Plan A, entrap, entrapment, frame, was not the Russian Company benefiting Hillary the most up until Narrative Plan B, was not it through algorithms that ads were being sent to Hillary’s opposition, advertising to people who were already Trump, Sanders, the Green Party,  is not that what ad advertising did, that already appealed to them, but did that not, Plan A, to connect as many of Hillary’s opposition to Russian, Russian companies, without their follower’s knowledge, entrapment, building a database connected to Russia collusion, Plan A, and Plan B, and is that not why Facebook allowed the frame to proceed, Hillary would win any way they thought, is not this why no government stopped them, this was creating a case to prosecute Hillary’s opposition, they were operating as if Clinton would win too, and this contributory negligence opens up the door to question, was there not double Russian agents involved in these firms working for the elect Hillary campaign?

Narrative Plan A was to stop Americans, that were not globalist, and Narrative Plan B was redesigned to do the same? As Rushbo, closed out his conclusion, that it was all fabricated through informants, agents, double-agents, entrapment, false narratives, and framing? Much the same as the last person that uncovered that the national debt, or the mortgage fraud pyramid scheme, existed and not many were interested in paying the bubble down before it busted?

“Research Guides: Researching Case Law: Home.” Consider a Discourse Community - English Composition 2089: Researching Discourse - Research Guides at University of Cincinnati, guides.libraries.uc.edu/c.php?g=222559&p=1472871

20 Years later, not many want “Draining the Swamp.’

According to the Audio, 1998, Banker Catherine Austin Fitts former Reagan administration HUD, economist, and political Website owner. Fitts was hired by the government and moved to Washington to undertake the monumental task of reforming, "draining the swamp," a scandal-ridden, fraud-plagued agency, mortgage fraud, the black budget (http://www.usdebtclock.org/), "disgraced" corporate TV news and their lies, her department to take on Clinton's "credit default swaps and financial derivatives," which contributed to the financial collapse in 2007-2008, in comparable to trillion-dollar national debt today as a balloon to cover-up, that then, and now, hocked citizen assets in US and moved then to Asia. US money was moved forever and draining the swamp” may be too late for the one world government to want to absorb or pay back this debt, http://www.usdebtclock.org/. In the end, her office and computers (data) seized. Will the US properties' and US citizens' properties be seized to settle and end this latest balloon hiding financial collapse? https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/GFDEGDQ188S 

Agenda 21 – Stole wealth from the American People to Asia 1992 – 1999 covered up by Mortgage Fraud and Credit Swaps Ponzi-scheme Market 2000 – 2007 covering the revenue gap which collapsed 2007 – Stole wealth from the American People and National Debt 2001 – Present 20 Trillion dollar bubble covering the revenue gap, made many people wealthy by stealing, not paying back, the US Treasury, Ponzi-scheme?

Killough, Ashley, and Manu Raju. “Ryan Says He Agrees with Gowdy That FBI Acted Appropriately.” CNN, Cable News Network, 6 June 2018, www.cnn.com/2018/06/06/politics/paul-ryan-fbi-trey-gowdy/index.html

Kotch, Alex. “After Scoring Huge Tax Cuts, Charles Koch Floods Ryan With Cash.” International Business Times, 19 Jan. 2018, www.ibtimes.com/political-capital/after-scoring-huge-tax-cuts-charles-koch-floods-ryan-cash-2643260 "Team Ryan, the joint fundraising committee, raises money for Ryan’s campaign committee, the NRCC and aseparate political action committee that Ryan operates called Prosperity Action. The day after the Koch donations, Ryan transferred close to $1 million from Team Ryan to the NRCC; $488,000 to Prosperity Action; and $219,000 to his campaign."

Paul Ryan, Congress 1999, Ways and Means Committee 2011 – 2016, Ways and Means Committee. is a permanent committee of the House of Representatives, which makes recommendations to the Congress, House, on all bills for raising revenue. The committee is the primary source of legislation concerning issues like taxation, customs duties, and international trade agreements.

“Judicial Watch: McCabe 'Used FBI Resources' For His Democrat Wife's Campaign.” CNS News, 31 Jan. 2018, www.cnsnews.com/news/article/michael-w-chapman/judicial-watch-fbis-mccabe-used-fbi-resources-his-liberal-democrat "Judicial Watch further reported "an October 2016 letter from House Government Oversight Committee Chairman Jason Chaffetz to McCabe questioning a possible conflict of interest by noting that [Hillary] Clinton headlined a Virginia fundraiser on June 26, 2015, for Mrs. McCabe. 'A significant amount was donated after the FBI had initiated its investigation and begun meeting with Secretary Clinton’s attorneys in August 2015.'”” In late 2015, Jilll McCabe received $675,288 in payments from two different [Democrat] PACs”Judicial Watch further reported "an October 2016 letter from House Government Oversight Committee Chairman Jason Chaffetz to McCabe questioning a possible conflict of interest by noting that [Hillary] Clinton headlined a Virginia fundraiser on June 26, 2015, for Mrs. McCabe. 'A significant amount was donated after the FBI had initiated its investigation and begun meeting with Secretary Clinton’s attorneys in August 2015.'”” In late 2015, Jilll McCabe received $675,288 in payments from two different [Democrat] PACs”

Sanders, Anna. “Democratic Parties Accused of Funneling $84M into Clinton Campaign.” New York Post, New York Post, 9 June 2018, nypost.com/2018/06/09/democratic-parties-accused-of-funneling-84m-into-clinton-campaign/

Rice, Frances. “8 Times Obama's Intelligence Agencies Set People Up To Fabricate The Russia Story.” BLACK REPUBLICAN BLOG, 1 Jan. 1970, blackrepublican.blogspot.com/2018/06/8-times-obamas-intelligence-agencies.html "5. Brennan Shops Dossier To Harry Reid Former CIA Director John Brennan, who may have been the U.S. intelligence official to first push an investigation into the Trump campaign, briefed then-Sen. Harry Reid on the Clinton-funded dossier in August 2016. The briefing did two things: First, it lent some legitimacy to the dossier, and second, it got Reid to pressure the FBI to not drop the investigation. The briefing had the added bonus of allowing Reid to speak publicly about Trump’s ties to Russia, as if he had just gained access to groundbreaking proof of collusion, which was of course covered by the media."

Hoffmann, Bill. “Ex-CIA Chief Brennan Headed to NBC/MSNBC.” Newsmax, Newsmax Inc. Newsmax Inc., 2 Feb. 2018, www.newsmax.com/newsfront/john-brennan-cia-nbc-msnbc/2018/02/02/id/841162/. "He will serve as a senior national security and intelligence analyst for the networks and make his first official appearance on NBC News's "Meet the Press" with Chuck Todd on Sunday. Read Newsmax: NBC/MSNBC Hires Ex-CIA Chief John Brenann | Newsmax.com Urgent: Do you approve of Pres. Trump? Vote Here in Poll"

"Similarly, such as interviews with law enforcement or skilled agents may duplicate what Rod’s Ethics professor was skilled in. He worked with a lot of law enforcement officers. He was also skilled at creating the “false narrative" (FAKE NEWS), by ignoring or avoiding what was not the beginning "false narrative" (FAKE NEWS); similar to hiding evidence, exculpatory evidence.” showing the skill to the class, as Rushbo described in the above podcast." 

Patten, Dominic. “Warriors Win Back-To-Back NBA Championships, But Ratings Take A Loss.” Deadline, Deadline, 9 June 2018, deadline.com/2018/06/kevin-durant-warriors-win-nba-finals-ratings-down-nba-abc-1202406923

Flint, Joe. “NFL Ratings Fall at Faster Pace.” The Wall Street Journal, Dow Jones & Company, 4 Jan. 2018, www.wsj.com/articles/nfl-ratings-fall-at-faster-pace-1515061801

Banker Catherine Austin Fitts Time line 1998 - 2010-2011 and Trump Campaign 2016 – 2018 much the same actions even though directors changed; Mueller put back in charge in 2017 Special FBI agency; so does the FBI protect the swamp; green sludge is money, oil, and political pay-to-play? “Drain the Deep State.” Grrr Graphics, 7 May 2018, grrrgraphics.com/shop/drain-deep-state/

As long as Law Enforcement Agencies protect Congress; Agenda 21, the swamp cannot be drained but remain broke(n) through insolvency?

FBI Directory Robert S. Mueller, III, September 4, 2001- September 4, 2013

FBI Directory (Interim) Andrew McCabe (Acting), May 9, 2017 - August 2, 2017

FBI Directory James B. Comey, September 4, 2013 - May 9, 2017

FBI Directory Christopher Wray, August 2, 2017 - Present

Contradictory, if Sessions was part, and not recused, from as one may call, the swamp investigation, then how could one argue that they are too, not part of the swamp, if they appointed the overseer, as they argue that the swamp is biased and misconduct existed? Was not the only way that Part B would work is for an investigation? The investigation must have occurred regardless of who was in charge?

“DOJ Expected to Release Report on Clinton Email Investigation.” MSNBC, NBCUniversal News Group, www.msnbc.com/weekends-with-alex-witt/watch/doj-expected-to-release-report-on-clinton-email-investigation-1252062787743 DOJ expected to release report on Clinton Email investigation on Trumps Birthday June 14, 2018 Gemini

                                                                               Read the Indictment: PDF - Reuters News Agency. Released on Trump, President's Day                                                                                                                        Weekend 2018
                                                                                   
fingfx.thomsonreuters.com/gfx/mkt/5/1605/1603/internet_research_agency_indictment.pdf 

Generally, some trolls attempt to send secret messages. For example, if someone was to really troll President Trump, they may threaten to arrest his business lawyer, and send him a stiff message on April 15th day, with Comey's great interview rant against him on April 15th day. But, collusion itself is not a crime. April 15th, could mean someone  has viewed his financial records, tax history, business dealings, and have him tape recorded. 2018

Apuzzo, Matt. “F.B.I. Raids Office of Trump's Longtime Lawyer Michael Cohen; Trump Calls It 'Disgraceful'.” The New York Times, The New York Times, 9 Apr. 2018 2018, www.nytimes.com/2018/04/09/us/politics/fbi-raids-office-of-trumps-longtime-lawyer-michael-cohen.html

                                                                               “HEADLINERS: James Comey' Airs Sunday, April 15 on MSNBC.” MSNBC, NBCUniversal                                                                                                                                 News 2018  Group, 10 Apr.2018,                                                                                                                                                                                                                     www.msnbc.com/originals/headliners-james-comey-airs-sunday-april-15-msnbc

Persons, Sally. “Rand Paul: Intelligence Community's Bias Shows Need for More Oversight.” The Washington Times, The Washington Times, 21 Mar. 2018, www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/mar/21/rand-paul-intelligence-communitys-bias-shows-more-/ “Sen. Rand Paul said Wednesday that there needs to be more limits put on the intelligence community’s reach on Americans’ information. “Now were seeing all these people from the intelligence community, Brennan [and] Clapper, all of them piling on and exposing themselves to be left-wing Democrats who hate the president. So yes, I think we have to be very careful about how much power we give to those in the intelligence community,” Mr. Paul, Kentucky Republican, said on Fox News. Mr. Paul was referencing former CIA Director John Brennan and former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper. Both men have come out with strong statements against President Trump after resigning their posts, but Mr. Paul said the issue is also bigger than a bias towards the president. “I think they should never be searching and American’s records without a judge’s warrant,” he said. Mr. Paul has long advocated for more oversight of mass data collection on American citizens, and said there needs to be a legal process to obtain such information.”

Hattem, Julian. “Rand Paul Calls for Removal of CIA Director.” TheHill, The Hill, 1 Aug. 2014, thehill.com/policy/technology/214128-rand-paul-calls-for-cia-chiefs-ouster “It is illegal for the CIA to spy on Americans and an affront to our republic to spy on the Senate,” Paul said. “Brennan told the American people that the CIA did not spy on the Senate but now he admits that they did.”” Leaders of the congressional Intelligence committees have also declined for the spy chief to be removed from office, even while denouncing the hacking incident.” So, there were CIA hacking American information while they were operating in foreign countries?

Farley, Robert. “Special Counsel Q&A.” FactCheck.org, 27 June 2017, www.factcheck.org/2017/05/special-counsel-qa/ "Can Mueller be fired? Yes, but not by the president, at least not directly. Only the acting attorney general — in this case, Rosenstein — can discipline or fire a special counsel, and then only for cause. According to the federal code, “The Attorney General may remove a Special Counsel for misconduct, dereliction of duty, incapacity, conflict of interest, or for other good cause, including violation of Departmental policies.” 

Thornburgh, Dick, et al. “Attorney General's Special Counsel Regulations.” Brookings, Brookings, 10 May 2017, www.brookings.edu/testimonies/attorney-generals-special-counsel-regulations/

SLAVES, Author GOV'T. “Agenda 21 For Dummies Part 1 & 2.” GOVT SLAVES, govtslaves.info/2012/06/agenda-21-for-dummies-part-1-2/

How to Hedge to Protect Yourself, 2030 Malicious Intent

Amadeo, Kimberly. “Will the Dollar Collapse in 20..?” The Balance, The Balance, www.thebalance.com/when-will-the-u-s-dollar-collapse-3305691

Amadeo, Kimberly. “Could You Survive a Dollar Collapse?” The Balance, The Balance, www.thebalance.com/dollar-collapse-how-to-protect-yourself-and-survive-3306263 "The Declining Value of the U.S. Dollar It is true that, over the long term, the dollar's value is declining. The dollar has declined 40 percent since 2002. It could decline further for the following five reasons. 1. A $21 trillion U.S. federal debt. 2. Excess liquidity causing inflation or, as is occurring now, asset bubbles. 3. The unsustainable personal debt of U.S. citizens. 4. A massive trade deficit. 5. The strength of emerging market countries, like China. They are becoming less dependent on holding U.S. dollars to keep the value of their currencies low. All of these forces drive down the value of the dollar, but only in the long term. How to Hedge to Protect Yourself"

Gabriel, Brian. “How Was the United States Government Funded Prior to Income Tax?” Pocket Sense, 30 Mar. 2018, pocketsense.com/united-states-government-funded-prior-income-tax-12769.html. "Tariffs In peacetime during America's early decades, most of the federal government’s revenue came from import taxes called tariffs. The U.S. Congress passed the Tariff Act of 1789 to help generate revenue to pay off its war debts and to encourage and protect manufacturers in the northern states. Congress also passed major tariff bills in 1816, 1824, 1828 and 1832.""Excise Taxes The early Americans accumulated a lot of debt associated with the Revolution. The federal government assumed the debt of the colonies and sought to pay it off by taxing imports and imposing excise taxes on products such as alcohol, tobacco and refined sugar. Congress passed an excise tax on all distilled spirits in 1791, causing an uprising among farmer/distillers in the western part of Pennsylvania. The Whiskey Rebellion ended with President George Washington mobilizing 13,000 militiamen from multiple states and arresting 150 rebellious farmers. Only two were convicted of treason and they were later pardoned."

Ronald Reagan Warned Us About NWO & Agenda 21, 1964, 50 years and still fooling the public. "There is no LEFT OR RIGHT, there is an up or down." You up with freedom to choose or down with socialism or communism.

“Ronald Reagan Warned Us About NWO & Agenda 21.” YouTube, YouTube, 21 Nov. 2016, www.youtube.com/watch?v=VXM9ltLOq2o
(National Socialist German Workers' Party commonly referred to in English as the Nazi and the Communist Workers Parties much the same; but they were not of America; Freedom, and were defeated by those seeking Freedom.)

“The Final Wakeup Call.” The Site in Dutch, finalwakeupcall.info/en/2015/10/21/agenda-21-converted-into-2030/ "If you didn’t like Agenda 21 that originally was planned for implementation by 2050 then you really are not going to like the 2030 Agenda, because the 2030 Agenda takes things to an entirely new level. The original plan for Agenda 21and now 2030 was written by Professor Weishaupt when he founded in 1776 the Order of the Illuminati; actually a fascist Nazi organisation, which employs as their frontman, government leaders"

One World Religion, Agenda 2030
Arab Spring and the Muslim Caliphate were very much the same. The Caliphate was to remove all non-Muslim government from the Arab and Northern African peninsula; and put Muslim governments in charge. The ruler of Egypt, Mubarak, a non-Muslim, was overthrown and jailed. He supported Christians. He was replaced by the Muslim Brotherhood, Morse. John McCain and Graham were two of the first dignitaries to visit Morsi and recognize the Government. They began persecuting Coptic Christians and the world outcry caused the Egyptian military to overthrow the government and put Mubarak supporters back in control. Qaddafi, a non-Muslim in the belief of many because his mother was of Jewish descent and married a Muslim, and the Koran says Muslims have to marry Muslims, was overthrown and killed. Different Muslim sects control and stole a large part of the citizen wealth and stipends from oil sales. Syria Assad was also non-Muslim and supported a large group of Christians living in Syria. Christians go back thousands of years in Syria. They all were painted as horrible men. Maybe they were. But, they all were non-Muslim. Russia stopped the Caliphate in Syria. Maybe, they are horrible too. But, they are non-Muslim and mostly Christian. Maybe, you too, are horrible.



Paletta, Damian, et al. “France's Macron Threatens Rare Rebuke of U.S. at G-7, Trump Fires Back.” The Washington Post, WP Company, 7 June 2018, www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/frances-macron-threatens-rare-rebuke-of-trump-at-g-7-says-us-faces-isolation/2018/06/07/f73f3de8-6a99-11e8-bea7-c8eb28bc52b1_story.html?utm_term=.9e8f3dfe6e70 “Please tell Prime Minister Trudeau and President Macron that they are charging the U.S. massive tariffs and create nonmonetary barriers. The EU trade surplus with the U.S. is $151 Billion, and Canada keeps our farmers and others out. Look forward to seeing them tomorrow,” Trump wrote. He followed it up with another tweet targeting Trudeau. “Prime Minister Trudeau is being so indignant, bringing up the relationship that the U.S. and Canada had over the many years and all sorts of other things . . . but he doesn’t bring up the fact that they charge us up to 300% on dairy — hurting our Farmers, killing our Agriculture!” he wrote."

“President Announces U.S. Withdrawal from Paris Climate Agreement.” C-SPAN.org | National Politics | History | Nonfiction Books, www.c-span.org/video/?c4672002/president-announces-us-withdrawal-paris-climate-agreement

Electronic Privacy Information Center. “EPIC - Electronic Communications Privacy Act (ECPA).” Electronic Privacy Information Center, Https://Epic.org/Privacy/Cloud-Act/   2018, epic.org/privacy/ecpa/  "ECPA included amendments to the Wiretap Act, created the Stored Communications Act, and created the Pen Register Act. The Wiretap Act concerns interception of electronic and wire communications, which include "any aural transfer made in whole or in part through the use of facilities for the transmission of communications by the aid of wire, cable, or other like connection.” An oral communication is "any oral communication uttered by a person exhibiting an expectation that such communication is not subject to interception under circumstances justifying such expectation"; this constitutes any oral conversation in person where there is the expectation no third party is listening." "2018 Executive Agreements The Act would also permit federal officials to enter into executive agreements granting foreign access to data stored in the United States, even if that data would otherwise be protected under ECPA." "2018 Because the CLOUD Act permits data to be accessed by foreign nations based on each nation’s unique domestic procedures, data is accessible under the third-party countries law even when that law falls below human rights standards. The CLOUD Act does not itself set baseline human rights standards for foreign access to stored data. For example, the CLOUD Act does not require notice to be provided to the target of a request for data stored in the United States. "The law also permits real-time interception of communications by foreign governments on U.S. soil for the first time,"

Doctorow, Cory. “The EU's Copyright Proposal Is Extremely Bad News for Everyone, Even (Especially!) Wikipedia.” Electronic Frontier Foundation, 7 June 2018, www.eff.org/deeplinks/2018/06/eus-copyright-proposal-extremely-bad-news-everyone-even-especially-wikipedia

Lynch, Jennifer. “HART: Homeland Security's Massive New Database Will Include Face Recognition, DNA, and Peoples' ‘Non-Obvious Relationships.’” Electronic Frontier Foundation, 7 June 2018, www.eff.org/deeplinks/2018/06/hart-homeland-securitys-massive-new-database-will-include-face-recognition-dna-and

IG report 6/14/2018. Nothing New! Nothing to add from it.

athanasakis1974. “The Rush Limbaugh Show Podcast Friday - Jun 15, 2018.” YouTube, YouTube, 15 June 2018, www.youtube.com/watch?v=BIDq8an2KKY

Example: False Narrative "Trump saluted Korean General ....," or Fake News, or the Fake News Media, Terrible as reporting news to America as American News source, or American news you can trust or as an unbiased truth American news media, but good for the pockets of many sewing discourse, not really research or education, maybe they work for Russia, Daily. Actually, the general reached out for a handshake, but decided to salute President Trump as two military men, and then Trump returned the gesture, respectfully, as two military men, Trump is the Chief Commander of the US military, and then they shook hands as diplomats. Maybe original, but perfectly ceremonial. 

Google Search, Google, www.google.com/search?q=trump shake hands of korean general&source=lnms&tbm=vid&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjj8PLL_djbAhVrrFQKHRG2BRkQ_AUIDCgD&biw=1920&bih=974

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Rod last visit to Lied Library to finish his research work was May 14, 2018. He does not see himself returning for much else. The research is complete. A few updates.

      Rod's Research: "Tax Day" 4/15/2018 - 5/14/2018
***Addendum 8/21/2018 Great day for some. 222777 (God)